answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Cortes faced hardships such as battles with indigenous populations, harsh conditions in the New World, and resistance from his own men. Pizarro faced dangers like conflict with Incan forces, navigating unfamiliar territory, and dealing with political rivalries among the Spanish conquistadors. Both faced disadvantages like limited resources, disease, and the unpredictability of indigenous alliances.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

3d ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What hardships dangers and disadvantages do Cortes and Pizarro face?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Archaeology

How is Francisco Pizarro and Hernando Cortes different?

Francisco Pizarro conquered the Inca Empire in South America, while Hernando Cortes conquered the Aztec Empire in Mexico. Pizarro's conquest led to the establishment of the Viceroyalty of Peru, while Cortes' conquest led to the establishment of New Spain. Their tactics and approaches to conquest differed, with Pizarro relying more on political maneuvering and alliances, while Cortes used military force and alliances with indigenous groups.


What is all true of the conquests of Pizarro and Cortes?

Both Pizarro and Cortes were Spanish conquistadors who led successful expeditions in the Americas. They conquered the Aztec Empire under Cortes and the Inca Empire under Pizarro, bringing vast territories under Spanish control. Their conquests resulted in the downfall of powerful indigenous empires and the establishment of Spanish colonial rule in the Americas.


What are the three spanish explorers?

Three famous Spanish explorers are Christopher Columbus, Hernan Cortes, and Francisco Pizarro. Columbus is known for his voyages to the Americas, Cortes for the conquest of the Aztec Empire, and Pizarro for the conquest of the Inca Empire.


What did Herman Cortes and Pizarro have in common?

Hernan Cortes and Francisco Pizarro were both Spanish conquistadors who played significant roles in the Spanish colonization of the Americas. They led expeditions that resulted in the defeat of the Aztec Empire in Mexico (Cortes) and the Inca Empire in Peru (Pizarro) during the 16th century. Both are known for their ruthless tactics and ambition for wealth and power.


How did the expeditions of Cortes and Pizarro differ from those e of other Spanish explorers in the Americas?

Cortes and Pizarro's expeditions were characterized by their military conquests of powerful indigenous empires such as the Aztec and Inca, respectively. Unlike other explorers who focused on exploration and trade, Cortes and Pizarro sought to conquer and colonize territories for Spain. Their expeditions led to the fall of these empires and the establishment of Spanish control in the region.