Article 249 in The Constitution Of India 1949
Power of Parliament to legislate with respect to a matter in the State List in the national interest
(1) Notwithstanding anything in the foregoing provisions of this Chapter, if the Council of States has declared by resolution supported by not less than two thirds of the members present and voting that it is necessary or expedient in national interest that Parliament should make laws with respect to any matter enumerated in the State List specified in the resolution, it shall be lawful for Parliament to make laws for the whole or any part of the territory of India with respect to that matter while the resolution remains in force
(2) A resolution passed under clause ( 1 ) shall remain in force for such period not exceeding one year as may be specified therein: Provided that, if and so often as a resolution approving the continuance in force of any such resolution is passed in the manner provided in clause ( 1 ), such resolution shall continue in force for a further period of one year from the date on which under this clause it would otherwise have ceased to be in force
(3) A law made by Parliament which Parliament would not but for the passing of a resolution under clause ( 1 ) have been competent to make shall, to the extent of the incompetency, cease to have effect on the expiration of a period of six months after the resolution has ceased to be in force, except as respects things done or omitted to be done before the expiration of the said period
Justice Vivian Bose, a former judge of the Supreme Court of India, is attributed with saying that Article 32 of the Indian Constitution is the "heart and soul" of the Constitution. This article guarantees the right to Constitutional remedies, allowing citizens to move the Supreme Court for enforcement of their fundamental rights.
Preamble is not considered the soul of Indian Constitution. Right to Constitutional Remedies are.
gandi
Preamble is not considered the soul of Indian Constitution. Right to Constitutional Remedies are.
Because the supreme court is given the power to protect ,safeguard,and uphold the constitution and empower to declare a law null and void if it is found to be in consistant with the constitution.Therefore supreme court is said to be the guardian of indian constitution.
Article V of US constitution deals with the procedure of introducing amendments in US constitution. It entails that both houses of US Congress must pass the said amendment with a two third majority after which the amendment is sent to states for ratification.
Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, founder of the Buddhist movement in India and author of the Indian Constitution.
Because the supreme court is given the power to protect ,safeguard,and uphold the constitution and empower to declare a law null and void if it is found to be in consistant with the constitution.Therefore supreme court is said to be the guardian of indian constitution.
If someone said the cabinet is elected, it would not be true. The cabinet is appointed by the president, who first nominates them and then has to get the approval of the Senate.
No,it is a protection of rights from the government of the citizens of the United States,which under Article 4,Section 4 of the said Constitution,every State in the Union is gauranteed the right to a republican form of government.The Union was created as a Republic and has been on the rise as a Democracy ever since.
Because the supreme court is given the power to protect ,safeguard,and uphold the constitution and empower to declare a law null and void if it is found to be in consistant with the constitution.Therefore supreme court is said to be the guardian of indian constitution.
If a law violates the US Constitution, it is said to be unconstitutional.