0
What hypothesis might another scientist suggest to Harte for the decrease in the number of salamander?
Wiki User
∙ 9y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is a hypothesis to prove that eating garlic prevents colds?
What a silly question! Look up the word 'hypothesis' and then ask it another way.
What is another word for plant scientist?
plantologist :)
Did sir Alexander Fleming work with any other scientist?
Yes he did, he worked with Thomas Watson. Another formal scientist.
How did the threshold for second action potential change as you further decrease the interval between the stimuli?
One might find how the threshold will change by inquiring the mind of a scientist at ones local college. Another way to find the answer to this question would be to research it in books at ones local library.
A hypothesis is a statement that can be?
To be of any use to science, a hypothesis must be able to be tested. For instance, I might have a hypothesis that there is a civilization of giant butterfly people living in another galaxy. If I have no way to test this idea, then it really isn't a hypothesis. It would just be a wild guess.
What options does a scientist have if experiment does not support hypothesis?
a scientist can do another experiment or change their hypothesis.
What do scientist do when a hypothesis is not supported by an experiment?
Scientists then state another hypothesis and test it out with another experiment.
What is another name for salamander?
another name for a salamander is a newt or siren. the scientific name for a salamander is a Ambystoma maculatum. The "Cave Salamander" or "White Salamander" is known as the Olm.
Why is A hypothesis important?
putting a certain hypothesis is important for the person making a certain experiment.For exampe,if s/he were a scientist,the hypothesis would help in knowing what experiments should be done(in another words,NO hypothesis-->NO experiments will be done).
Why is formulating a hypothesis important?
putting a certain hypothesis is important for the person making a certain experiment.For exampe,if s/he were a scientist,the hypothesis would help in knowing what experiments should be done(in another words,NO hypothesis-->NO experiments will be done).
When the evidence in a scientific experiment does not support the hypothesis what should the scientist do?
When the evidence in a scientific experiment does not support the hypothesis the scientist:Confirm through repeated experimentation that the evidence is validReject the hypothesisDevelop another hypothesis that is consistent with the valid evidence
A scientist has a hypothesis that the moon broke off of another planet floated through space and got caught in the Earth's gravitational pull Does this hypothesis have the potential to become a the?
it has the potential to become a law.
What is another name for a newt?
its an aquatic salamander (salamander that lives in water)
Why might it be important for scientists to be able to communicate their methods and their findings?
Scientists first create an hypothesis. They develop methods to prove their hypothesis. In order for other scientists to replicate the findings and prove or disprove another scientist's outcome, the original scientist MUST describe the methods used and the findings.
What is contintel drift?
A hypothesis proposed by German scientist Alfred wegner which states the continents have moved, or drifted, from one location to another over time.
Why is collaboration of scientist is necessary for the process of scientific study?
The most important reason is if a single scientist forms a hypothesis and it is proved by his or her experiment it is still only a hypothesis. Other scientists need to repeat the experiment in every way conceivable to either prove or disprove the hypothesis. Only after the hypothesis has stood up to such scrutiny may it become a theory recognized by the scientific community. Another reason is that some research is simply too daunting and complex for a single person to complete.
What is your next step if your data doesn't support your hypothesis?
Propose another hypothesis; the hypothesis is revised and another experiment is conducted.
