Want this question answered?
Legally your previous employer cannot give a negative feedback to a potential new employer. All they can do is verify employment, dates of employment, and the position held by the employee.
The only things that a previous employer can say are #1- if you are re-hirable and #2 - what dates you were employed there. The problem is that in order to take legal action you have to be able to 100% PROVE that the previous employer said more than that. An employer can give a negative reference for a former employee if they wish to, but they are not required to. The employer may be exposed to liability, or at least to the expense and distraction of a lawsuit, if it gives such a reference. The former employee may allege that the information provided was false or misleading. The burden of proof would be on the employee to prove what the employer said and how it was defamatory. Truth is a defense to the employer. For this reason, many employers have policies prohibiting giving any reference, positive or negative, and will only confirm the dates of your employment and last title. Some employers may disclose if you are re-hirable, but a non-answer or negative answer to this question could again expose the employer to claims.
Sure. Besides, you wouldn't want their reference then, since it would be negative. Certainly. Most companies will only validate that an employee worked there from their start date to their end date. The usually won't even say why the individual left.
The word snoop has negative connotations here. But an employer has every right, and a duty too, to ensure an employee is not abusing email.
The employer will assume an employee has stolen something from the company.
The employer will assume an employee has stolen something from the company.
u just come down and tell him that he had a good point
An employer is not obligated to provide any reference to a former employee. Therefore, you cannot force your former employer to give you a reference. ¾ If you can prove that your former employer gave you an improper reference, and if you can prove that you did not get a job because of it, you may be able to sue your former employer. (The legal terms for this wrong include "defamation," "injurious falsehood," "negligence" or "negligent misstatement.") ¾ It is very difficult to prove both that the reference was improper, and that you would have got the job if it were not for the bad reference. Even if you can prove that an improper reference was given, you still have to prove that you would have landed the job except for the reference. New employers will seldom, if ever, give you that information. ¾ The fact that an employer refused to provide a reference, or provided a bad one, may increase your former employer's liability if you are suing your former employer for wrongful dismissal. The form of a reference letter and what will be said when new employer contacts your former employer is often negotiated as part of a wrongful dismissal settlement. ¾ Technically, the Consumer Reporting Act of Ontario prohibits prospective employers from seeking a reference unless you have given permission in writing. Sometimes this permission is included in the application for employment. Generally, employers are unaware of their obligations under this statute. ¾ If you request it, the Consumer Reporting Act also requires an employer who does not hire you as a result of a negative reference to inform you of the negative reference and what was said. However, most employers are unaware of their obligations under the Consumer Reporting Act, and it is very difficult to enforce this claim. Your community legal clinic Toll Free: 1 877 966 8686 Fax: (613) 966 6251 TTY: (613) 966 8714 158 George Street, Level 1 Belleville, ON K8N 3H2 Tele: (613) 966 8686 w w w . c o m m u n
If it is positive. You shouldn't say anything negative (especailly personally) about an employee, (former). If they didn't get the job or heard what you said, they could sue you.
Due to workers compensation laws, an employer must either allow their employee time off work with no negative consequences, or find another job that the worker is capable of performing during recovery. While each state has specific laws regarding workers compensation, if an employee is injured on the job, they are protected from write-ups and termination.
some disadvantages to the employer is they might have had a good picture of the people that they were nice and kind at heart so they hired them but when the emplee stricks at them it makes them have a bad image of the employee but the employer cant do anything to take that back he just has to lay them off
Absolutely not. The only information an employee can give is whether or not you could be rehired within that company , your job description, and how long you were an employee within that company anything else is confidential and illegal.