If you didn't take out the loan in your name than he commited fraud. You can ask the bank to prove you signed the document and take them to court over the matter.
student with books are more knowledge than students without books because students without books is less knowledge.
No, it is no more illegal for a teacher to text a student than to email a student. It would be inappropriate for such to happen without the prior knowledge of the parents of the student, but not illegal.
If your name was added on the initial applications (with or without your knowledge) then yes, you would be responsible for the debt. If not, the debt still needs to be paid - and proceeds for that can come out of the deceased person's estate ... for married couples, that can mean ... You ... as the widower is the estate at this point.
No, the refinancing without the consent or knowledge of the original cosigner created a breach of the original lending agreement and the cosigner is no longer legally obligated for the debt.
No,thats wrong if there family its even worse
If parents are aware that their teenage children are using illegal drugs and they allow this to happen, then they do have some legal responsibility. If it is happening without their knowledge, then they are not legally responsible.
No, Your taxes are really only able to be diverted for Government debts, child support and student loans.
It is a tool of measurement, a standard by which a student's academic performance can be measured. Without a tool of measurement, there would be no way to know exactly what knowledge a student has retained, and in some cases a student's ability to apply that knowledge by practical performance.
Yes if it was done before she became your ex, no if she did it after, yes if the child lives with you.
what is the meaning of zeal without knowledge is fire without light
Both because a teacher cannot teach without a student and a student cannot learn without a teacher.
zeal without knowledge is a runaway horse