Science has nothing to do with rights with respect to the law. What is the purpose for asking the question?
There is no homogenized view among liberals with regards to animal rights. However, liberals tend to be more welcoming of animal rights groups than conservatives.
they can be eaten but they should have some rights republican for whole life thinks this
Third person - limited.
Emma Burke's point of view can vary depending on the context. Generally, she is known for advocating for social justice, women's rights, and LGBTQ+ rights. She often speaks out against discrimination and inequality in society.
from my point of view frog is the best
well from my point of view yes yes there is
From the perspective of the dog (in the movie) and the narrator in the book
That's debatable question but in a strictly scientific point of view, it is neither a bad nor good animal. but in my point of view they're a good animal. Well in Asia, cheetas are considered as if they were pets bacause they hwlp the Asian people bring food to the table. =)
Plato believed that women had a right, while in the point of view of Greek, they had little to no rights.
that the English don't give us the same rights.
The Federalists thought the existing laws would be enough to protect individual rights and the B of R was not necessary.