0
What is a decision made by a higher court such as a US Court of Appeals Circuit Court or the US Supreme Court that is binding on all federal courts?
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
A decision made by a higher court sets a binding precedent for the inferior court(s).
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the hierarchy of binding precedents within the federal court system?
US Supreme Court decisions are binding on all federal courts, but are most likely to be applicable to cases heard in US District Courts or appealed to US Court of Appeals Circuit Courts. The Supreme Court's decisions are also binding on State courts if they involve constitutional amendments that have been incorporated to the states.US Court of Appeals Circuit Court decisions are binding on all US District Courts within that Circuit, but only carry persuasive precedential weight in other Circuits. The decisions are not binding on other Circuits or on any state courts. US District Court decisions are not binding on other courts, but may be cited as persuasive precedents by other courts, regardless of which Circuit the court belongs to.When US Court of Appeals Circuit Courts issue conflicting decisions on substantially similar matters (called a Circuit Split), they may induce the US Supreme Court to grant certiorari for a case that can be used to resolve or clarify the constitutional issue. The Supreme Court decision will then create a binding precedent used in deciding similar future cases.When Circuit Splits are unresolved, the individual decisions -- although conflicting -- remain binding within each Circuit, but not outside the Circuit. This raises the possibility that one or more of the other ten regional Circuits* will further complicate matters by creating a third split, resulting in inconsistent constitutional interpretations and application of law. For this reason, reviewing cases that address Circuit Splits are high on the US Supreme Court's list of priorities.* The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has special subject matter jurisdiction and is less likely to be affected by decisions made in the regional Circuits.
Why does it make sense that a supreme court decision is not permanently binding?
The decision is binding for the particular case decided on by the Court. Of course the Government can change the law, and that law must be obeyed.
What is the hierarchy of courts in the Judicial Branch?
One Supreme CourtThere is one Supreme Court of the United States that serves as the final appellate court for the Judicial Branch. Supreme Court decisions set binding precedents for the courts below it.Thirteen CircuitsThere are thirteen US Court of Appeals Circuit Courts that serve as intermediate appellate courts between the trial courts and the Supreme Court. Most federal appeals are resolved at the Circuit level. Twelve of the Circuits have territorial jurisdiction over specific regions of the country and the District Courts operating in those regions. The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has nationwide jurisdiction over special subject matter cases, such as appeals from the US Court of Federal Claims, and trademark and patent cases.US Court of Appeals Circuit Courts set binding precedents for the US District Courts within their territory, but their decisions are not binding on other Circuits or Districts outside their territory.Ninety-Four DistrictsThere are 94 US District Courts in the United States and its territories, all distributed amongst the federal Circuits. The District Courts are the trial courts that serve as the point of entry to the federal judiciary. District Court decisions are not binding on other courts.One Special Subject Matter CourtThere is one US Court of International Trade in New York City that functions as a trial court at the same level as the US District Courts. The USCIT has subject matter jurisdiction over customs cases and other matters related to international trade disputes.Attempt at Hierarchy Diagram1 US Supreme Court/|\13 US Court of Appeals Circuit Courts/|\94 US District Courts and 1 US Court of International Trade
Which constitutional amendments are not incorporated?
The Seventh Amendment is not incorporated, and the Third and Eighth Amendments are only partially incorporated. The Third Amendment was upheld by the Second Circuit, making the Amendment binding on Connecticut, New York and Vermont, only. The Circuit Court decision has persuasive value for the other Circuits, but does not set a binding precedent on them.The Second Amendment was recently incorporated when the US Supreme Court released its decision in McDonald v. Chicago,561 US ___ (2010) on June 28, 2010.For more information, see Related Questions, below.
After state supreme court what is next?
That depends on the case. Often, the state supreme court is the end of the road for a case, making the decision of the state supreme court final and binding. Sometimes cases involved federal questions (issues arising under the US Constitution or federal law) that allow them to be appealed to the US Supreme Court. If the US Supreme Court hears such a case, it may affirm or overturn the state supreme court decision.
Is a US District Court decision binding on the Virginia Court of Appeals?
Technically no, because all states have autonomous jurisdiction. A US District Court decision is persuasive authority over a state court. A US District Court is a federal court, not a state court. A state supreme court decision however, is binding authority on a state appeals court level, and a trial court decision in that state would still be persuasive because its from a lower court. The decision from the Virginia Court of Appeals, however, becomes a binding authority over the state court.
On which states are appeals court ruling binding?
On State Courts of Appeal - their rulings are binding on the entire states court system. On the findings of a Federal Appeals Court - they are binding upon the federal district courts within THAT appeals courts circuit.
What is the hierarchy of binding precedents within the federal court system?
US Supreme Court decisions are binding on all federal courts, but are most likely to be applicable to cases heard in US District Courts or appealed to US Court of Appeals Circuit Courts. The Supreme Court's decisions are also binding on State courts if they involve constitutional amendments that have been incorporated to the states.US Court of Appeals Circuit Court decisions are binding on all US District Courts within that Circuit, but only carry persuasive precedential weight in other Circuits. The decisions are not binding on other Circuits or on any state courts. US District Court decisions are not binding on other courts, but may be cited as persuasive precedents by other courts, regardless of which Circuit the court belongs to.When US Court of Appeals Circuit Courts issue conflicting decisions on substantially similar matters (called a Circuit Split), they may induce the US Supreme Court to grant certiorari for a case that can be used to resolve or clarify the constitutional issue. The Supreme Court decision will then create a binding precedent used in deciding similar future cases.When Circuit Splits are unresolved, the individual decisions -- although conflicting -- remain binding within each Circuit, but not outside the Circuit. This raises the possibility that one or more of the other ten regional Circuits* will further complicate matters by creating a third split, resulting in inconsistent constitutional interpretations and application of law. For this reason, reviewing cases that address Circuit Splits are high on the US Supreme Court's list of priorities.* The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has special subject matter jurisdiction and is less likely to be affected by decisions made in the regional Circuits.
Is a decision in one Circuit binding on another Circuit?
Yes, decisions made by a US Court of Appeals Circuit Court are binding only on US District Courts in their territory. They are not binding on state courts or on other federal Circuit or District courts.
Is a decision on a case in Alaska from the Ninth Circuit binding in Maryland in the Fourth Circuit?
true
Why does it make sense that a supreme court decision is not permanently binding?
The decision is binding for the particular case decided on by the Court. Of course the Government can change the law, and that law must be obeyed.
Which precedent is binding on the us district court for the southern district of new york?
second circuit and supreme court
Did the US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit rule on the constitutionality of statewide bans on same-sex marriage?
Yes. On June 25, 2014, the 10th Circuit ruled that Utah's ban on same-sex marriage is unconstitutional. This ruling is binding also on Colorado, Kansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico and Wyoming. The decision, however, was temporarily stayed (delayed) for at least 90 days pending appeal. Then, on July 18, 2014, the 10th Circuit ruled a second time, this time striking down Oklahoma's ban on same-sex marriage. That decision was also stayed. On October 6, 2014, the United States Supreme Court refused to hear these appeals and the stays were lifted by the 10th Circuit the following day.
What is the hierarchy of courts in the Judicial Branch?
One Supreme CourtThere is one Supreme Court of the United States that serves as the final appellate court for the Judicial Branch. Supreme Court decisions set binding precedents for the courts below it.Thirteen CircuitsThere are thirteen US Court of Appeals Circuit Courts that serve as intermediate appellate courts between the trial courts and the Supreme Court. Most federal appeals are resolved at the Circuit level. Twelve of the Circuits have territorial jurisdiction over specific regions of the country and the District Courts operating in those regions. The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has nationwide jurisdiction over special subject matter cases, such as appeals from the US Court of Federal Claims, and trademark and patent cases.US Court of Appeals Circuit Courts set binding precedents for the US District Courts within their territory, but their decisions are not binding on other Circuits or Districts outside their territory.Ninety-Four DistrictsThere are 94 US District Courts in the United States and its territories, all distributed amongst the federal Circuits. The District Courts are the trial courts that serve as the point of entry to the federal judiciary. District Court decisions are not binding on other courts.One Special Subject Matter CourtThere is one US Court of International Trade in New York City that functions as a trial court at the same level as the US District Courts. The USCIT has subject matter jurisdiction over customs cases and other matters related to international trade disputes.Attempt at Hierarchy Diagram1 US Supreme Court/|\13 US Court of Appeals Circuit Courts/|\94 US District Courts and 1 US Court of International Trade
How do you determine the precedential value of a case?
You have to look to the jurisdiction of the court which issued the opinion. If it is a court of appeals case that is in the same city as your district court case, or if it is a state supreme court or U.S. Supreme Court decision, then the case is binding authority--the judge has to consider it as the law. If the case comes from a court of appeals in a different city/county, or if it is a federal case from a different circuit, then the case is merely persuasive--the judge can use it or disregard it as he or she sees fit. Note: although I refer to a court of appeals as being in a particular city (which is how they are generally named), that court usually has authority over lower courts in surrounding towns, cities, counties, etc.
Are all federal appellate court decisions binding on every federal trial court?
No, that's backwards. Binding precedents are set from the top-down.US Supreme Court decisions are binding on all relevant federal (and state) courts.US Court of Appeals Circuit Court decisions are binding only on US District Courts within that Circuit.US District Court decisions are not binding on any other Courts.Non-binding precedents, including dissenting opinions, may be cited as persuasive precedents at any level, however.
What term applies to the grant of review sought by an appellant who seeks to overturn in the US Supreme Court a decision of the US Court of Appeals?
An appellant may file a motion for a rehearing, if warranted, but the US Supreme Court has full discretion to grant or deny this request. If denied, the case is considered res judicata(completed), and the decision of the Court is both final and binding.
