alot alot
$750 and up, depending on condition,markings,and history of the gun.
You must seek the services of a qualified appraiser.
It all depends on condition. The 32" vent rib barrel is a rare configuration, even in the Trap gun. If it is in 95% or better condition, it could easily hit $500-$600. sales@countrygunsmith.net
Hunter Holster 1100 is not a model. It's a "series". The model number is usually the 1100 followed by a 2 digit number. Example "1100-50" fits 7-1/2" Barrel Freedom Arms Model 353, 455, Ruger Blackhawk, Super Blackhawk, Redhawk, Super Redhawk Double check the holster. Usually it's branded with the full model number.
A Winchester model 1894 rifle with a 6 digit serial number was made from 1894-1927.That being said and the fact that your rifle has a 26in octagon barrel could place the value of your rifle in the range of 600 dollars plus in value.It is not unheard of these rifles going for 1,000 dollars plus.In order to have a Winchester of this age value determined,I would have a Member of the Winchester collector assoc.come in and appraise the rifle for value and overall condition.
The value of a 32.20 Smith and Wesson 1914 revolver 6 shot with a sawed off barrel depends on the condition and the model number. Model from this year are valued between 400.00 and 650.00 but the sawed off barrel greatly reduces value.
no it has a 4 digit serial # Knickerbocker came from 2 different companies. The American Gun Company, New York, stamped a five digit serial number on the barrel, forestock and stock end.
The 69 is the Police version of the 67 In like new condition they are worth about $200 down to about $50 in less condition
how does 100 meet the specification? 1 is in the hundreds digit and 0 is in the tens digit. 1 is not at least 0. this is a confusing question?!
Until you provide the bame of the maker and a detailed description of all features, box, papers, accessories, condition and finish - nothing.
411 =========================== Another response: This contributor says that there is no answer. The conditions cannot be satisfied, because the specifications are self-contradictory. A digit cannot be "one more than but not greater than ..." another digit. Note: The first answer, above the line, can't be a solution, because it violaes the condition that its "... hundreds digit and ones digit is the same ..." .
check with: felix@bedians.com