0
If John is a dragon, then John can both breathe fire and fly. John cannot both breathe fire and fly. Therefore, John is not a dragon.
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
When the premise of a deductive argument follow the correct form we call the argument?
Valid. A deductive argument is considered valid when it follows the correct form of logic, even if the premises are not true. This means that if the premises of a valid deductive argument are true, then the conclusion must also be true.
Can a valid deductive argument have a false conclusion?
No, a valid deductive argument cannot have a false conclusion. If the argument is valid, it means that the conclusion logically follows from the premises. If the conclusion is false, it means that the argument is not valid.
What will the The truth table for a valid deductive argument show?
The truth table for a valid deductive argument will show that when the premises are true, the conclusion is also true. It will demonstrate that the argument follows the rules of deductive logic and the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises.
Example of a line of reasoning that presents a deductive argument?
All humans are mortal. Socrates is a human. Therefore, Socrates is mortal.
What passage is the best example of deductive reasoning?
One famous example of deductive reasoning is the philosophical argument known as "Socrates is a man; all men are mortal; therefore, Socrates is mortal." This syllogism clearly demonstrates deductive reasoning through a series of logical steps leading to a specific conclusion.
What is a deductive argument?
A deductive argument is a logical reasoning process where the conclusion necessarily follows from the premise. If the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. It is a form of reasoning that aims to provide logically conclusive evidence for the conclusion.
Is the ontological argument deductive or inductive?
The ontological argument is typically considered a deductive argument. It aims to establish the existence of God by reason alone, starting from the concept of God as a necessary being. It proceeds through logical steps to demonstrate that God's existence is a necessary consequence of His definition.
What are Deductive and Inductive argument means?
Deductive reasoning is drawing a specific conclusion from general principles or premises that are known to be true. It aims to provide certainty in the conclusion. Inductive reasoning, on the other hand, involves making generalizations or probabilistic conclusions based on specific observations or evidence. It aims to provide strong support for the conclusion without guaranteeing absolute certainty.
What is more common inductive argument or deductive argument?
Deductive arguments are more common than inductive arguments. Deductive reasoning begins with a general statement and applies it to a specific case, leading to a certain conclusion. Inductive reasoning begins with specific observations and generates a general hypothesis.
How is inductive reasoning different from deductive reasoning?
Inductive reasoning varies from deductive reasoning as follows: 1) inductive reasoning is a reason supporting an argument and 2) deductive reasoning is an argument against an argument.
What are the 4 fundamentals of logic?
Argument Deductive argument Inductive Argument Analogy
A deductive argument with two premises is a?
A deductive argument with two premises is a syllogism in logic. It consists of a major premise, a minor premise, and a conclusion that follows logically from the premises.
What involves in the deductive argument?
seeing logical relations
Known as a two-promise deductive argument?
Syllogism
What should a deductive argument never be characterized as?
A deductive argument should never be characterized as uncertain or probabilistic. It aims to provide a conclusion that necessarily follows from the premises, making it either valid or invalid based on the structure of the argument and the truth of the premises.
What is the difference between a valid deductive argument and a fallacy?
A valid deductive argument will have a valid premise and conclusion and a fallacy may be true, it all matters on how you came to the conclusion.
What is one general principle in the deductive argument of the declaration?
One general principle in the deductive argument of the Declaration of Independence is that all people are created equal and have inherent rights that cannot be taken away. The Declaration asserts that government is established to protect these rights, and when it fails to do so, the people have the right to alter or abolish it.
