1. Slavery (specific to the way it should be written in the Constitution)
2. The need for a Bill of Rights
3. Weaknesses in Articles of Confederation (could they be revised to avoid writing a completely new document aka the Constitution? or are they impossible to work with?)
4. Legality of the actual writing of the Constitution (conference was actually supposed to be used to revise the articles, but instead was clandestine and involved the writing of an entirely new document)
what is a opponet
There were two sides to the Great Debate: the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists wanted to ratify the Constitution, the Anti-Federalists did not.
There were two sides to the Great Debate: the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists wanted to ratify the Constitution, the Anti-Federalists did not.
The Federalists, who were for the ratification of the Constitution, and the Anti-federalists, who were against the ratification.
Anti-Federalists
anti-federalists.
no they were leaders of the anti-federalists.
The federalists supported the constitution but the anti federalists wanted to change/tweak the constitution.
Federalists were overwhelmingly northern; Anti-Federalists were overwhelmingly southern
Most anti-federalists consist of lower case merchants and farmers. So to answer your question, most anti-federalists were not wealthy.
Type your answer here... i dont know
The two main factions at the Constitutional Convention were the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. Basically, the Federalists were in favor of a single governing power, while the Anti-Federalists recognized the need for states to govern themselves.