answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Arousal theory is based on the ideas that different individuals perform better at different levels of arousal and that every individual seeks to find its optimum level. Some people enjoy a quite evening to relax while others might prefer a loud concert to end a tough week. This also explains the behaviors of thrill-seekers. There optimum arousal level is high, so to feel comfortable they get involved in sensational acts.

Another part of the arousal theory is the Yerkes-Dodson law. This states that simple tasks require a high level of arousal to get the motivation to do them, while difficult tasks require low arousal to get the proper motivation. You may have found that doing your boring busy-work homework requires a lot of effort on your part while doing a difficult brain teaser is fun and is easy to concentrate on.

User Avatar

Rosa Koelpin

Lvl 13
2y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

One statement that describes arousal theory is that it is inherited and does not have to be learned.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What is arousal theory?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What are the Applications of excitation transfer theory?

Excitation theory is a misattribution of arousal.


What is Hans eysenck's inhibition and arousal theory?

Eysenck's inhibition and arousal theory proposes that individuals differ in their baseline level of arousal and their threshold for stimulation. According to this theory, introverts have higher baseline arousal levels and lower thresholds for stimulation, leading them to seek out quieter, less stimulating environments. In contrast, extroverts have lower baseline arousal levels and higher thresholds for stimulation, prompting them to seek out more stimulating environments.


Describe drive theory?

At low levels of arousal, performance is low and performance increases in line with an increase in arousal.


How does Lazarus's cognitive-mediation theory differ from the Schachter-Singer cognitive arousal theory?

Lazarus's cognitive-mediation theory focuses on how cognitive appraisals of a situation mediate the emotional response. It suggests that when individuals appraise a situation as having personal relevance or as a threat, they experience emotional arousal. On the other hand, the Schachter-Singer cognitive arousal theory proposes that emotional experiences arise from the interpretation of physiological arousal, which is then given meaning through cognitive labeling. Thus, while Lazarus's theory emphasizes cognitive appraisals, the Schachter-Singer theory emphasizes the interpretation of physiological arousal.


Similar and difference between James-Lange Theory and Lazarus-Ishachler Theory of emotion?

These two theories differ more than they are similar to each other. The James-Lange theory argues that we experience the arousal from the event or situation first, and then we interpret the arousal and experience the emotion. Without the arousal there is no emotion experienced. The Lazarus theory argues that we must have a cognitive thought before any arousal or emotion is experienced. Without the thought there is no emotion experienced. These two theories are similar in the arousal that we experience before and during the emotion.


Which theory of emotion states both psychological arousal and emotion simultaneously?

cannon-bard theory


Attention arousal set theory and sports performance?

arousal is the amount of mental energy or preparedness a person has prior to performance


Which theory of emotion states that both physiological arousal and emotion occur simultaneously?

Cannon-Bard theory


Which theory suggests that you can experience emotion even without sympathetic nervous system arousal?

cannon-bard theory


Is the drive theory and you theory the same?

If by which you mean the Inverted-U Theory then no they are not. The drive theory suggests the relationship between arousal and performance to be linear, suggesting that as arousal increases as does performance. This has been rejected by most phychologists and adopted the Inverted-U Hypothesis. The Inverted-U hypothesis suggests that though there is a link between arousal and performance it is not linear, more likely an upwards parabola, or an upside-down or 'inverted' U. This suggests that as arousal increases so does performance but only to an optimal point, after which it begins to deteriorate.


Drive theory in physical education?

It indicates that there is a relationship between arousal and performance.


The arousal theory of motivation would be most useful for understanding the aversive effects of?

Boredom