Want this question answered?
The Big Crunch hypothesis.
No. Universe A expands from a 'Big Bang' stops expanding, and contracts until there is a 'Big Crunch'. Then there is a new big bang and the beginning of Universe B, a middle, and another big crunch, a big bang with Universe C and so on. At the time of any 'big crunch', all matter and energy from that universe ceases to exist. It cannot manifest itself until after the next 'big bang', and then has no relation to anything in its previous manifestation.
The Oscillatory Theory of cosmology.
I think it is the big bang theory, big crunch theory and i don't know the other one.
These are interesting conjectures, but there is no way to determine if any of them have any validity. My own favorite unprovable hypothesis is the Big Bang/Big Crunch of a cyclical universe; everything in the universe eventually falls together in a Big Crunch, reaching infinite density, and a rebound effect causes the collapsed universe to explode into a new Big Bang - to be followed some uncounted billions of years later by another Big Crunch. There's no way to prove - or to disprove - this idea, either. The truth is, for now, we do not have enough information to determine what the origin of the universe is, or what the ultimate fate of the universe will be. We may NEVER know these things.
in big bang theory the particles will just move away outside. while in big bounce, a stage will come when all the particles once again will form singularity as the result of big crunch. that's what i think.
The big bang is a one off, the big bounce is cyclic.
The Big Crunch hypothesis.
No. Universe A expands from a 'Big Bang' stops expanding, and contracts until there is a 'Big Crunch'. Then there is a new big bang and the beginning of Universe B, a middle, and another big crunch, a big bang with Universe C and so on. At the time of any 'big crunch', all matter and energy from that universe ceases to exist. It cannot manifest itself until after the next 'big bang', and then has no relation to anything in its previous manifestation.
yes it will happen again after the big crunch then of course, the big munch..... At present there is no evidence that another Big Bang will occur.
The Oscillatory Theory of cosmology.
The big bang theory is the explosion that started the universe. Where as the big crunch is the theory where the universe will eventually contract and become increasingly clumped and eventaully all mater would collapse into black holes which would then coalesce producing a unified black hole or Big Crunch singularity.
There may be at some point near the end of the universe, if the whole universe does the opposite of the Big Bang. Should the universe implode into one big mass in what we call the Big Crunch, another Big Bang could follow. Humans may not experience this because as it stands now, when our Sun dies, Earth dies. Additionally, nothing we know of could survive the Big Crunch.
For starters, the universe was formed from a big bang not crunch.When the big bang happened a bunch of rocks and gases were in space.The rocks and gases then clumped together and then planets were formed.
I think it is the big bang theory, big crunch theory and i don't know the other one.
yes it states that the universe will stop expanding and start crunching back up to a state before the big bang
There is no data on what might have occurred before the Big Bang. There is not even a consensus on whether the phrase "before the Big Bang" is valid to begin with.That having been said, cosmologists now strongly favour non-cyclical models of the universe; the hypothesis that the Big Bang might be a continuation of the cosmos following a preceding Big Crunch is very much out of favour.