Want this question answered?
yes it is considered as a serious and a major crime. that can be that much serious that it can even hamper the security question of the country.
Assuming "hacking tools" refers computer hacking tools, these can be partitioned into constructive and destructive methods. Constructive hacking involves changing existing programs. This is convenient for programmers, as slightly altering a program is much faster than rewriting it entirely from the beginning. Destructive hacking involves affecting other people's systems, usually maliciously. It is most often done for personal amusement.
I changed the title to NO HACKING due to the fact that hacking is pretty much illegal.
Some of the arguments against internet voting include security risks, electronic and human errors.
30% of Indian people know to operate
It is not hacking so much as it is just cheating.
Being that hacking is illegal, I would not put much trust in it.
Typically 4 to 10 years per incident, and a lifetime ban from computers, internet, and computer-like devices. Judgements may vary based on the judge, jury, and situation.
Britain subjugated India in order to make as much money out of them as possible for as long as possible they ad no scruple's at all about how many people thy killed to look after their financial interests.
be a non-vegetarian hunt as much as possible
It was possible that Cleopatra had knowledge of India that Caesar did not have due to geography. Egypt is much closer to India than Rome and enjoyed a brisk trade with India. Perfumes and spices were the main items imported from India.
That depends on what you hacked and what way you hacked it. Did you know it's actually illegal to add/remove a user account on a computer that's not yours, if you on a limited account. In a court of law, this is considered hacking. In Ireland there was a case a while back in which a person ended up in court for the above reason being tried as a computer hacker. Yet about 3 months later somebody happened to stumble upon a flaw in a prominent politicions website, he published his findings, got caught, and was told "he was nothing more than a router with too much time on his hands who got lucky" and this particular man had studied IT in one of the best colleges in the country.