To defund a company means the withdrawal of the financial support.
RMG news newsdesk@rmgnews .com I'm Austin Timothy RAISHBROOK and I'm better than anyone in this TV news company I distinguished owned it.
All the dumb people better get off my back and stopp tagging my name into the internet, especially fat old women and DUMB TEENAGER FEMALES. ALL TEEN FEMALES OF VAN NUYS YOU AND PANORAMA CITY STINK ! GO HOME MEXICANS, YOU DONT LIVE HERE Austin
defund
They defend themselfs by their nails, and their teeth
He will not sign a bill to defund acorn. As he has stated...They will always have a seat at his table. The government stopped funding ACORN in 2009.
In the beginning, the lawmakers were having trouble reaching an agreement about whether Democrats should have the additional wanted money for Obamacare. The two main reasons that led to the government shutting down was to defund Obamacare and repealing the medical device tax.
What Reagan did was to defund certain types of mental illness disabilities, mainstreaming them. This created a huge increase in homelessness when these former patients were turned out with no place to go.
The House and the Senate disagee on Obamacare and the House tied legislation to increase the debt to a bill to defund Obamacare. The Senate refuses to consider it, so the government is out of funds and government workers are begin laid off.
In the beginning, the lawmakers were having trouble reaching an agreement about whether Democrats should have the additional wanted money for Obamacare. The two main reasons that led to the government shutting down was to defund Obamacare and repealing the medical device tax.
As a matter of law, Congress cannot strictly defund the ACA. As a functioning law, the ACA must be funded, though the degree to which it receives funds is given wide lattitude.That is, Congress could pass a bill (and a President sign it) that removes all funding from all parts of the system required to make the ACA function. However, two things woudl still occur:The law would remain in force, so which the government aparatus directly supporting it's operation would not be funded, the law would still have a significant effect, and all sorts of enforcement and operations would be carried out by the relevant departments.A lawsuit would almost certainly result, and the Supreme Court would require at least a minimal amount of funding for the ACA. That is, the Supreme Court would force Congress and the President to at least make a basic effort to enforce and fund the law, as there is no question as to its validity (SCOUTS has priorly ruled that the law is Constitutional, and thus, must be enforced).Second, there is no "Supreme Court Law" regarding the ACA. What the Supreme Court ruled was that the ACA itself was a legal use of Congressional Power.Finally, the "Defund" attempts are nothing more than political stunts - that is, they are designed solely for media attention, and not any serious legislative work. No one would actually ever try to defund the system. Rather, if it became sufficiently unpopular (and a majority of Congress and the President agreed), then it would simply be REPEALED. As the different between defunding and repealing is virtually nill in terms of political requirements, defunding would never happen.
The noun 'company' is used as a collective noun for:a company of actorsa company of angel fisha company of archer fisha company of finchesa company of molesa company of parrotsa company of soldiersa company of widgeon (a type of duck)
A company that controls another company is called the parent company and the company it controls is called a subsidiary
which was the company that acquired by the intel company
Any company are not a cheeting company including nidhi company. But any company can cheet with people.