a law has been tested over and over agian and is a very certain concept and is not likely to change. a theory on the other hand is more likely to be corrected and changed, like the theory of relativity, although it is the best description of physics we have now, it is still likely to be changed someday
Law refers to established rules and regulations that are enforced by a governing authority, whereas theory is a set of principles or abstract ideas that explain a particular phenomenon. Laws are practical and have legal consequences if violated, while theories are hypotheses or models that help to understand and predict outcomes.
Legal theory refers to systematic frameworks used to analyze and understand the law, while jurisprudence is the philosophy and theory of law and the principles and methods used in legal reasoning. In other words, legal theory is more about analyzing and explaining the law, while jurisprudence is concerned with the nature of law itself.
The broken windows theory suggests that addressing minor signs of disorder, such as littering or vandalism, can prevent more serious crimes from occurring in a community. This theory has influenced policing strategies focused on community policing and proactive enforcement.
A Theory is unproven, but Laws are proven. Theory becomes law after that theory is proven correct.
Jurisprudence.
Both law and theory are based on principles and guidelines that explain phenomena or govern behavior. They are established frameworks that are continuously refined through observation, testing, and revisions. Both aim to provide understanding and predictability in their respective fields of study.
A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of a natural phenomenon that is supported by evidence and can be used to make predictions. It is a broad explanation that may encompass multiple related hypotheses. In contrast, a scientific law is a statement that describes a consistently observed behavior in nature but does not explain the underlying reasons for that behavior. Laws are usually more specific and narrow in scope compared to theories.
command of sovereign sanctioned by punishments is law by imperative theory and law as legal science of norms is by pure theory of law.
A Theory is unproven, but Laws are proven. Theory becomes law after that theory is proven correct.
naomi_uzor@yahoo.com
The theory come first because without a theory there is nothing to make a law.
A theory, when proven over time, can become a law. Example: Law of Gravity and Theory of Evolution
Pure Theory of Law was created in 1934.
Both law and theory are based on principles and guidelines that explain phenomena or govern behavior. They are established frameworks that are continuously refined through observation, testing, and revisions. Both aim to provide understanding and predictability in their respective fields of study.
differentialdiff means diffrentiate
d/dx sinx = cosx
A law is known to be true. There is no dispute about it. A theory is disputable. Gravity is a law, the Big Bang is a theory.
A law is a description of a naturally occurring phenomenon, whereas a theory attempts to explain a law.