Legislation imposed by human authority, implementing the natural law. It may take one of two forms, declarative or specifying. Declarative positive laws simply declare in so many words what the natural law prescribes or draw conclusions deducible from the natural law. Such are laws forbidding murder, theft, or perjury. They differ from natural law only in the manner of promulgation, say the State, and not only by the natural light of reason. Specifying positive laws determine or establish specific ways of acting in accordance with the natural law but not directly concluding from it. Such are traffic laws, ways of collecting taxes, and the conditions for just contracts. No human law that contradicts the natural law is a true law, but it need not merely re-echo the natural law.
~Seem below link:
Natural law theory exaggerates the relation of law and morality. Positive law is a reaction against particularly that aspect of Natural law theory. It insists on a distinction between human law, which they call positive law and moral and scientific laws. Human laws are posits of human society while scientific laws are independent of what we take them to be.
Positive law is the same thing as human law. So any type of law that is promulgated by the states/government is a positive law. For example, the speed limit is a positive law. Laws against murder are also positive laws, but they are based on the Natural Law. All positive laws should be based on the Natural Law, but they are not. The laws on abortion, for example, are contrary to the Natural Law; however, the laws on abortion are positive laws.
help!!??what is the properties of human law? help!!??what is the properties of human law? help!!??what is the properties of human law? help!!??what is the properties of human law?
Natural Law is law that derives from the basic human instincts of morality, it is the highest law of society, For example, nobody need ever tell a human killing another human is wrong, they know by virtue of human morality Positive law is laws written and enacted by men, ie laws of a country eg constitution, acts of government etc Eg. Murder is wrong, is a natural law Eg You must stop at a red light while driving is a positive law MGSmith BCL, MA JUR It may be interesting to read the Nuremburg Trials of the Nazi's. When at trial the Nazi's claimed they had not broken any laws as they had followed all the laws of the country and all orders of their superiors (Herr Hitler) However, the judges decided that they had broken a higher law (Natural Law) That it is immoral to kill. The judges held that when a positive law (eg all Jews can be killed) conflicts with a natural law (murder is wrong) then one should always follow Natural Law and the Nazi's had failed to do this, they should have disobeyed their orders on virtue of natural law being the supreme law. Ironically because of this they were sentenced to death
No common law is actually closer to natural law, but is a combination of both positive and natural law
Human + Religion = Law
Natual Law is a system of law that is purportedly determined by nature, and thus universal. Classically, natural law refers to the use of reason to analyze human nature, both social and personal, and deduce binding rules of moral behavior from it. Natural law is classically contrasted with the positive law of a given political community, society, or state, and thus serves as a standard by which to criticize said positive law.
Legislation imposed by human authority, implementing the natural law. It may take one of two forms, declarative or specifying. Declarative positive laws simply declare in so many words what the natural law prescribes or draw conclusions deducible from the natural law. Such are laws forbidding murder, theft, or perjury. They differ from natural law only in the manner of promulgation, say the State, and not only by the natural light of reason. Specifying positive laws determine or establish specific ways of acting in accordance with the natural law but not directly concluding from it. Such are traffic laws, ways of collecting taxes, and the conditions for just contracts. No human law that contradicts the natural law is a true law, but it need not merely re-echo the natural law. ~Seem below link:
It's the law.
I am not positive, but these may be the words of "Bertrand Russel"?
Dimitris Xenos has written: 'The positive obligations of the state under the European Convention of Human Rights' -- subject(s): Human rights, Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, International and municipal law
Obviously, human rights law has always something to do with humans rights. Anything that violates human is opposite to human rights law.