No. Ignorance of the law is not a viable defense to the charge of copyright infringement.
Copyright infringement is primarily a civil offense however there are options to prosecute criminally in the case of "willful and deliberate" acts of infringement. Ignorance of the existence of copyright is not a viable defense to infringement. If an author is convicted of copyright infringement the publisher can be held liable for contributory infringement if it can be shown that they had knowledge of the infringement prior to publication. If, by a preponderance of the evidence, infringement can be shown then yes a damages award to the copyright holder can be granted.
There are a variety of reasons...1) Ignorance of the copyright laws.2) Copyright "Urban myths" (I can use X amount of a work w/o permission, If I don't charge for it it's ok, etc)3) The belief that the internet is anonymous so I won't get caught4) I gave the original author credit so I can do it5) If there's no copyright notice it's free for me to use.
There is not specific collective noun for the noun ignorance. The noun ignorance is an uncountable noun; quantities of ignorance are expressed in degrees, for example, some ignorance, much ignorance, total ignorance, etc. A term that expresses ignorance as a collective would be, 'the collective ignorance of a group' or 'the combined ignorance of a group'.
Ignorance
Ignorance refers to a lack of knowledge, understanding, or awareness about something. It can lead to misunderstandings, misinformation, and biases. Overcoming ignorance requires seeking out information, being open-minded, and being willing to learn and grow.
ignorance comes from you. only you.
ignorance - ignoranza
The opposite of ignorance is knowledge
Ignorance is often the root of misunderstandings and conflicts in society.
Some say ignorance is bliss.
Ignorance - album - was created in 1987.