0
What else can I help you with?
Before conducting an experiment a scientist needs to review?
results of other experiments related to the subject.
What does a scientist need to review before conducting an experiment?
results of other experiments related to the subject.
A scientist does an experiment The results of the experiment disagree with a major scientific theory What should the scientist do?
Analyze the experiment to decide whether the results were flawed.
A scientist performs an experiment The results of the experiment disagree with a scientific theory The scientist repeats the experiment several times and gets the same results The scientist then?
The scientific theory should be changed.
When conducting an experiment using scientific method the scientist should?
When conducting an experiment using the scientific method, the scientist should first formulate a clear hypothesis based on observations. Next, they should design and conduct a controlled experiment to test this hypothesis, ensuring that variables are properly managed. After collecting and analyzing the data, the scientist should draw conclusions and communicate the results, which may lead to further experimentation or refinement of the hypothesis. This iterative process helps advance scientific knowledge.
What do scientist use to summarize their experiment and results?
the answer is a conclusion
Why do you use a large sample size when conducting an experiment?
Better the results
What do scientist write after their experiment that summarizes their results?
After conducting an experiment, scientists typically write a section called the "Results" in their research paper. This section summarizes the findings of the experiment, often presenting data in the form of tables, graphs, or figures. Additionally, they may include a "Discussion" section to interpret the results, explaining their significance and how they relate to existing knowledge. Together, these sections provide a comprehensive overview of the experiment's outcomes.
Why is a controlled experiment valuabl e to a scientist?
It gives the scientist something to compare their results to.
Do your results have to match your hypothesis in an experiment?
The results of a science experiment do not have to match the original hypothesis. Indeed, the results collected in an experiment may be completely different to those that the scientist predicted.
Why is it important that a scientist results are evaluated by other scientist?
The first scientist may have made a mistake, or tailored the experiment to fit either a hypothesis or favorable results. The second scientist's results help to reinforce ar refute the first scientist's results.
What can a scientist do if the results of an experiment do not support a hypothesis?
draw conclusions
