The first scientist may have made a mistake, or tailored the experiment to fit either a hypothesis or favorable results. The second scientist's results help to reinforce ar refute the first scientist's results.
it is important because we do not know if one scientist's results will be the same as another. I hope I've helped=]
it is important because we do not know if one scientist's results will be the same as another. I hope I've helped=]
The first scientist may have made a mistake, or tailored the experiment to fit either a hypothesis or favorable results. The second scientist's results help to reinforce ar refute the first scientist's results.
The results may influence future investigations conducted by other scientists. STUPID STUDY ISLAND....
it is important because we do not know if one scientist's results will be the same as another. I hope I've helped=]
1. Its important because if you repeat you'll get consistent results. 2. That means if a scientist gets different results it means they did something wrong in the experiment
There are various reasons. Here are some:They might be skeptical of the reliability or truth of what other scientists have claimed.They might be trying to understand the earlier results better.They might be hoping to extend the other scientist's results.They might be trying to determine whether there are limits to the applicability of the other scientist's results.
communicate their results to other people
Graphs
Reproducibility is the major method for other scientists to confirm the work of one scientist. When one scientist does an experiment, s/he publishes the results so other scientist can read and verify the results. If similar results are obtained by verification, then the results are partially confirmed.
go to school
results of other experiments related to the subject.