0
Why is it important that a scientist's results are evaluated by other scientist?
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
it is important because we do not know if one scientist's results will be the same as another.
I hope I've helped=]
Margaretta Barrows
Elinor McDermott
it is important because we do not know if one scientist's results will be the same as another.
I hope I've helped=]
Wiki User
∙ 9y agoIt's important for scientists to share their investigations so other scientists can learn from that one scientist's mistakes. Also, so that they can build on one another's successes. Perhaps person A has an idea about how to start something, which person B would never have thought of, but when person B sees it, then person B has a great idea about how to improve it. And maybe person C sees a flaw in the idea, and person D knows how to fix it. Person E knows how to make it cheaper and more accessible for everyone. Together, we make things much better than we can alone.
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoThe first scientist may have made a mistake, or tailored the experiment to fit either a hypothesis or favorable results. The second scientist's results help to reinforce ar refute the first scientist's results.
Wiki User
∙ 10y agoThere are several reasons.
It's expensive to publish scientific results. Reviewing scientific papers, preparing them for publication, printing them and distribution them in paper or electronic form are all costly activities. Scientific results cannot be evaluated by lay people. It is therefore necessary for other scientists to do this work to decide whether any given results are worth the cost of publishing them.
Scientists want to be sure that published results meet agreed standards for the research itself, for analysis of results and for the quality of communication. In particular they want to know that members of the scientific community will benefit from new results and that these results will be presented in a way that is comprehensible.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why do scientist publish the details if important experiments?
Scientists publish the details of important experiments so that people can recreate it and see the results for themselves.
Why do scientist share information?
It is important for scientists to communicate to others not only the results of the investigation, but also the methods by which the investigation was done.
Why is it important that science investigations be repeated What happens when other scientists achieve different results when repeating an investigation?
1. Its important because if you repeat you'll get consistent results. 2. That means if a scientist gets different results it means they did something wrong in the experiment
What process assures that claims made by scientists are reliable?
Reproducibility is the major method for other scientists to confirm the work of one scientist. When one scientist does an experiment, s/he publishes the results so other scientist can read and verify the results. If similar results are obtained by verification, then the results are partially confirmed.
When scientist are ready to publish the results of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedures the used?
Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.
Why is it important that a scientist's result's are evaluated by other scientists?
it is important because we do not know if one scientist's results will be the same as another. I hope I've helped=]
Why is it important that scientists' result are evaluated by other scientists?
it is important because we do not know if one scientist's results will be the same as another. I hope I've helped=]
Why is it important that scientists result are evaluated by other scinetists?
The first scientist may have made a mistake, or tailored the experiment to fit either a hypothesis or favorable results. The second scientist's results help to reinforce ar refute the first scientist's results.
Why is it important that a scientist results are evaluated by other scientist?
The first scientist may have made a mistake, or tailored the experiment to fit either a hypothesis or favorable results. The second scientist's results help to reinforce ar refute the first scientist's results.
Why is it important for a scientist to communicate his or her results with other scientist?
The results may influence future investigations conducted by other scientists. STUPID STUDY ISLAND....
Why is it important for a scientist to communicate his or her results with other scientists?
The results may influence future investigations conducted by other scientists. STUPID STUDY ISLAND....
Why do scientist publish the details if important experiments?
Scientists publish the details of important experiments so that people can recreate it and see the results for themselves.
Why do scientist share information?
It is important for scientists to communicate to others not only the results of the investigation, but also the methods by which the investigation was done.
Why is it important that science investigations be repeated What happens when other scientists achieve different results when repeating an investigation?
1. Its important because if you repeat you'll get consistent results. 2. That means if a scientist gets different results it means they did something wrong in the experiment
What process assures that claims made by scientists are reliable?
Reproducibility is the major method for other scientists to confirm the work of one scientist. When one scientist does an experiment, s/he publishes the results so other scientist can read and verify the results. If similar results are obtained by verification, then the results are partially confirmed.
When scientist are ready to publish the results of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedures they used?
Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.
When scientist are ready to publish the results of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedures the used?
Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.
