0
What is it to judge where possible points of conflict may develop?
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
Predict
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How To judge where possible points of conflict may develop?
Predict (IPDE Process)
Can a judge rule on a case where the judge was the prosecutor?
Generally, one can either be a judge or a prosecutor. No person is going to hold both of these positions at the same time. Even if it were possible, having someone in both positions is a conflict of interest, and a new judge would be appointed.
What are the judge points on Fantage for?
It is to earn a medal.
What are judge points on fantage?
the judge pionts on 7,10,and 5 i helped yall bye
Can a lawyer or party object to a particular judge hearing a case?
Yes, a party can file a "motion to recuse" a judge if they believe the judge is biased or there is a conflict of interest. The decision to recuse the judge is typically made by another judge.
Why conflict occurs in the workplace?
Conflict occurs when individual or group of persons wish to carry out acts which are mutually inconsistent and also occurs in an organization because of changes. Project managers must develop effective communication skills to resolve project conflicts. The objective of project manager is not only to resolve the conflict but also to perform as a judge in assisting the employees to reach tolerable result.
If your attorney and the judge for your case are co defendants in an unrelated separate trial is this a conflict of interest?
If a judge and a lawyer are under trial, they shouldn't be practising. You can probably apply for a mistrial or something, under conflict of interest or incompetency.
What is it called when a judge removes themselves from a case?
Recuse... judge is asked to step down due to conflict or other reasons.
Do the judges judge by points or time?
depends on what game some are both
Are there any circumstances in which a plaintiff in a civil matter can ask a judge to recuse him- or herself?
Anytime a judge has a conflict of interest in a lawsuit he should recuse himself. Reasons a plaintiff can ask for recusal include the judge is related to, is a friend of or a business partner with defendant. Or if the lawsuit is against a company the judge has invested in and a judgment against the company might harm his investment. Or that the judge had worked with defendant's law firm or been partner's together. Or that there had been some altercation or disagreement between plaintiff or plaintiff's lawyer and the judge do that it might appear that the judge would be prejudiced against the plaintiff. Lawyers and judges are expected not only to avoid improprieties like those but also to avoid even the appearance of impropriety. This means that even if an investigation into an alleged conflict of interest shows no actual conflict of interest, the judge should probably recuse himself if it appears to be a conflict.
Are there any circumstances in which a plaintiff in a civil matter can ask a judge to recuse him or herself?
Anytime a judge has a conflict of interest in a lawsuit he should recuse himself. Reasons a plaintiff can ask for recusal include the judge is related to, is a friend of or a business partner with defendant. Or if the lawsuit is against a company the judge has invested in and a judgment against the company might harm his investment. Or that the judge had worked with defendant's law firm or been partner's together. Or that there had been some altercation or disagreement between plaintiff or plaintiff's lawyer and the judge do that it might appear that the judge would be prejudiced against the plaintiff. Lawyers and judges are expected not only to avoid improprieties like those but also to avoid even the appearance of impropriety. This means that even if an investigation into an alleged conflict of interest shows no actual conflict of interest, the judge should probably recuse himself if it appears to be a conflict.
If the judge knew the plantiff in a divorce can the defendant file for a retrial dur the the conflict of interest?
The judge also knows both attorneys. Simply knowing someone is not the issue. It's whether they have a personal or professional relationship. Is there something about the decision that has the appearance of conflict?
