Nuclear waste is the spent fuel discharged from the reactor, and it is highly radioactive and would rapidly kill any person or animal exposed to it. Therefore it must always be well shielded. At first after removal from the reactor it is kept immersed in water, but after some time it can be removed into shielded containers. It would never be dumped into the sea, as the zirconium sheath material would be corroded after years and allow the dangerous material to escape.
Yeah, if u can take it on the moon.
It shouldn't. The exportation of toxic and dangerous substances to a foreign land is illegal under international law.
Construction waste should be dumped at designated landfills or recycling facilities to ensure proper disposal and minimize environmental impact.
Liquid wastes should not be dumped down a sink because they can cause back-up. This liquid waste could also break pipes.
nuclear waste dumped into water supply
No.
During President Clinton's term, international inspectors were not allowed to look at North Korean sites where nuclear waste was being dumped because the North Koreans did not want people to know what was going on. That country continues to keep much of their nuclear capability a secret from the rest of the world.
Yes, if they are exposed to irradiation or nuclear contamination. That is one of the arguments against nuclear power, that not only is nuclear waste produced in the reactor, but that eventually the entire reactor container will have to be disposed of or isolated.
Large startup costs and the generation of nuclear waste
This sounds a very bad idea, volcanoes erupt sometimes and would spew it out again. Even volcanoes that have not erupted for many years may do within the lifetime of the nuclear activity of the waste
in the sea
nuclear waste is worst