Objective contextualism is a perspective that acknowledges the importance of context in shaping individual experiences and behaviors while also emphasizing the existence of objective truths or facts. It suggests that understanding different contexts can provide valuable insights into the nature of reality and knowledge.
An objective statement is based on facts and observable phenomena, while a non-objective statement is influenced by personal opinions, biases, or emotions. Objective statements are verifiable and rooted in evidence, whereas non-objective statements often reflect subjective viewpoints or interpretations.
Subjective is an antonym for objective. It refers to personal opinions and beliefs rather than facts and evidence.
An objective conclusion is a statement or judgment that is based on facts, evidence, and logic rather than personal feelings or opinions. It is a perspective that is unbiased and can be supported by verifiable information.
The concept of objective good can be both unitary and plural. In some ethical systems, there may be one ultimate objective good (unitary), while in others there could be multiple factors contributing to what is considered objectively good (plural). The perspective on whether objective good is unitary or plural can vary based on philosophical and cultural beliefs.
Objective morality refers to moral rules or principles that are universal and independent of personal beliefs or opinions. Subjective morality, on the other hand, is based on personal feelings, beliefs, or opinions and can vary from one person to another. Objective morality tends to be fixed and unchanging, while subjective morality may be more flexible and open to interpretation.
As it pertains to a given situation
The interpretive theory is known as contextualism, but judges or justices who are proponents of contextualism (and/or a Living Constitution) are often also accused of being judicial activists.
contextualism--look at clues surrounding the passage to infer its meaning. literalism--interpret exactly as written It is also clear that the two are not necessarily mutually exclusive. The context may well determine whether a certain passage is to be taken literally or figuratively. Thus, a literal interpretation is called for unless indicated otherwise by the context. The two go hand in hand.
An objective clause is a clause which is like a learning objective but this is the objective for an clause
a predicate objective is a predicate that has an objective
An objective is a noun, but you can use objective as an adjective, in which case the superlative is - the most objective.
the scan objective is the shortest objective ,, and has a magnification of 10x
the scan objective is the shortest objective ,, and has a magnification of 10x
what is a objective stance
Objective observations are observations that are made based on facts and measurable data, free from personal bias or interpretation. They are observations that can be confirmed or validated by multiple individuals and are not influenced by personal opinions or feelings.
LPO or Low- Power Objective is the smallest objective while HPO or High-Power Objective is the lowest objective.
what does it means that historians strive to be objective