A outcome / result to positive conflict is stronger friendship. The conflict that you had with your friend may prove how strong your friendship is.
GENERAL DEFINITION A conflict over a fixed amount of resources / positive outcomes where one person (group) will win and one lose (Khun and Poole 2000). Such conflicts arise when, in a given situation, the aggregate and individual demands exceed aggregate and allocated supply respectively. This is to say that both party-A and party-B demands what they are likely to (reasonably) receive (through legal, politcal, institutional allocation mechanisms) - driving aggregate demand over finite supply. It is assumed that none of the parties involved are inclined towards concessions in their demands. Therefore, there are no win-win situation in such an approach to conflict management. One party may, at best, achieve/exceed its desired quota ...in which case, the other will invariably lose out. Integrative Conflicts, on the other hand, focus more on integrating needs and mutual concessions for the best overall outcome within a system. It may help to remember that both are approaches for conflict 'management' - not 'resolution'.
The antonym for external conflict is internal conflict. External conflict is conflict that is caused by an outside force, whereas internal conflict is a conflict that occurs within, a conflict with one's self.
Deciding whether or not to stay true to one’s heritage is an example of internal conflict
One conflict I can think of is that Camryn needs to find out who the Christopher Killer is, which is quite obvious.
One central driving unifying conflict.
Generally speaking, the Israeli-Palestinian Relationship is one of struggle and hardship.
The same as adding a positive one.
There are many different causes and different effects. To answer this effectively, one would have to consider each conflict separately
one of Simon Frasers hardship is scervy
Japan came into direct conflict with the United States.
Japan came into direct conflict with the United States.
The word "hardship" is one word, meaning difficulties or adversity.
It depends on how deep the conflict affects one another. If the conflict deepens, then one could get distracted from the objective. If it's positive conflict, then it could affect one another in good ways. So, it can be good ore bad.
The trek over the Oregon Trail presented more than one hardship.
One can alleviate hardship in life by being sincere, hardworking & punctual towards one's goal...
Intellectual conflict is conflict that happens in every single individuals thoughts . For a given situation there will be two type of decisions taken , one will slightly be a negative manner and the other thought a positive and beneficial for everyone.. This will be felt when one carefully observes each of his thoughts. This is called the intellectual conflict inside us.
Hunger was one hardship faced by the citizens of Vicksburg during the siege of 1863.