0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Who makes the Bradley fighting vehicle?
They were made for the U S Army by FMC based in San Jose CA The vehicles are also known as the Infantry fighting vehicle or M2, the Calvary fighting vehicle or M3 , and the Multiple launch rocket system or MLRS
What element was used to make the Bradley fire support vehicle atomic bomb?
The Bradley vehicle is not a nuclear capable weapon system.
What is the m1 bradley tank?
The M1, and the Bradley are actually two entirely different machines. The M1 and derivatives are collectively known as the Abrams Tank. The Bradley series of vehicles are M2's. The M1 is a Main Battle Tank(MBT), armed with usually a 120mm Smoothbore gun, with integrated fire control systems. The Bradley which is the M2, is known as the BRadley fighting Vehicle. whlie yes it does have a turret on top it is not a tank. It is an armed and armored personnel carrier. The Abrams Tank, carries a small crew of I believe 4. Driver, gunner, Commander, and Loader. The Bradley carries the same crew, but also a squad of soldiers in the back. The Bradley fires a 20mm canon, and usually as a TOW missile system, which is capable of destroying just about any tank out there. The Bradley while called a fighting vehicle which it is, is an APC as mentioned above, and it's gun is pretty much anti personnel. The Abrams on the other hand being a tank, takes out other tanks. While the BRadley can also take out tanks, it's TOW missile system only houses 2 missiles. It is not a tank hunter, but has the TOW system for defense against tanks.
How were the positions of Neptune and Uranus in the solar system determined?
parallax
What has the author Samuel Messenger Bradley written?
Samuel Messenger Bradley has written: 'Injuries and diseases of the lymphatic system'
Why did the existence of stellar parallax not convince people in Copernicus time that his model was better than Ptolemys geopcentric model?
Stellar parallax could not be observed until hundreds of years after Copernicus: the effect is very small. Rejection of the Copernican system was not irrational.
What is a trench system?
a system that's fighting for land
How did the Aristotle's inability to detect parallax lead him to propose a geocentric model of the solar system?
He reasoned that since parallax could not be observed for celestial objects near the sun, then the earth was stationary. This erroneous assumption was because at the time he had no way of knowing that celestial objects were so far away that their parallax angles were too small to detect.He reasoned that since parallax could not be observed for celestial objects near the sun, then the earth was stationary. This erroneous assumption was because at the time he had no way of knowing that celestial objects were so far away that their parallax angles were too small to detect =) Hope it helped. I had the same question
How did aristotles' inability to detect parallax lead him to propose a geocentric model of the solar system?
He reasoned that since parallax could not be observed for celestial objects near the sun, then the earth was stationary. This erroneous assumption was because at the time he had no way of knowing that celestial objects were so far away that their parallax angles were too small to detect.He reasoned that since parallax could not be observed for celestial objects near the sun, then the earth was stationary. This erroneous assumption was because at the time he had no way of knowing that celestial objects were so far away that their parallax angles were too small to detect =) Hope it helped. I had the same question
How did Aristotle inability to detect parallax lead him to propose a geocentric model of the solar system?
He reasoned that since parallax could not be observed for celestial objects near the sun, then the earth was stationary. This erroneous assumption was because at the time he had no way of knowing that celestial objects were so far away that their parallax angles were too small to detect.He reasoned that since parallax could not be observed for celestial objects near the sun, then the earth was stationary. This erroneous assumption was because at the time he had no way of knowing that celestial objects were so far away that their parallax angles were too small to detect =) Hope it helped. I had the same question
How did Aristotle's inability to detect parallax lead him to propose a geocentric model of the solar system?
He reasoned that since parallax could not be observed for celestial objects near the sun, then the earth was stationary. This erroneous assumption was because at the time he had no way of knowing that celestial objects were so far away that their parallax angles were too small to detect.He reasoned that since parallax could not be observed for celestial objects near the sun, then the earth was stationary. This erroneous assumption was because at the time he had no way of knowing that celestial objects were so far away that their parallax angles were too small to detect =) Hope it helped. I had the same question
What planet would have no advantage of any kind over earth for making parallax measurements?
You have to ask yourself what is an advantage when parallax measurements are being made? . . parallax happens when you move to a different place and the object you see look a little different, the closest ones appear to have moved more than the ones that are further away. In astronomy parallax is created when the Earth is in opposite points of its orbit. Stars that are close appear to have moved a little, relative to the mass of stars that are a long distance away. Parallax was not observed before the 19th century, and the lack of parallax was always used to 'prove' that the Earth could not possibly be going round the Sun. It was only in the 19th century that parallax was observed, but it was only very tiny movements of the closest stars. It forced people to realise that the stars are incredibly far away and the Earth does go round the Sun after all, so it was extra evidence of the Sun being at the centre of the solar system. A parallax measurement is easier to make if the baseline is longer, so the answer to your question is that Mercury and Venus have no advantage for making parallax measurements.
