It is not "bushito" but "bushido," a many centuries old moral code followed by the samurai emphasizing self discipline, martial arts, and honor. Live by the sword, die by the sword. To surrender is dishonorable.
there were 500,000 men in the Japanese army
There were NO Japanese Soldiers involved with the attack. The attack was conducted by Japanese AIRCREWMEN. Soldiers fight on the ground. Airmen fight in the sky. Sailors fight on the sea. Marines are NAVAL INFANTRY.
Aproximatly 43,785,394 Soldiers were taken prisoner by the japanese.
The Japanese treated ALL Allied prisoners B A D L Y. The Empire of Japan was not a signatory to the Geneva Convention, therefore they were not bound to treat their prisoners humanely. The Code of Bushito dictated that Japanese Soldiers would never be captured. If they were, that brought shame not only to the man who surrendered, but to his family also. The Japanese applied this Code to Allied Prisoners, military & civilian alike, making them sub-human in the eyes of their captors. Simply put, Allied POWs were loathed by their Japanese captors. Richard V. Horrell WW 2 Connections.com Answer AS RICHARD SAID ABOUT THE CODE OF BUSHITO. ALSO I BELEIVE ACCORDING TO THE SAME CODE,A PRISONER THAT WAS EXECUTED BY BEHEADING WAS CONSIDERED TO HAVE DIED WITH HONOR. HOWEVER WESTERNERS FOUND IT A QUITE APPALLING WAY TO GO.(I AGREE)Further:Apart from the idological approach, which overstates the realities on the ground, there was a practiclal one. The Japanese army need a labour force. The POW were impressed as slaves to build military railways, work in mines, war production. Australian prisoners were used along with other prisoners and inhabitants of the conquered countries as labourers on the Siam-Burma railway construction and in Japan in mining and industry. This had nothing to do with ideology. As a Japanese said 'many men must die' meaning that the work would be unrelentingly severe to achieve the aim of the railway construction - to support the Burma campaign - nothing to do with Bushido.
unquestioned discipline of the Japanese soldiers and civilians!
it was more honorable to die than surrender
The Bushido code taught that it was more honorable to die than to surrender.
They were Japanese soldiers who followed the bushido code of honor and fought for their emperor to the deAth sword was their most prized posession
Because the Japanese fought to the death. They did not surrender.
Russian soldiers
Used Native language to code messages that the Japanese could not decipher.
Used Native language to code messages that the Japanese could not decipher.
caves
there were 500,000 men in the Japanese army
There were NO Japanese Soldiers involved with the attack. The attack was conducted by Japanese AIRCREWMEN. Soldiers fight on the ground. Airmen fight in the sky. Sailors fight on the sea. Marines are NAVAL INFANTRY.
2113 allied soldiers 1996 Japanese soldiers 4000 civilians
Japanese Soldiers on the Taku Road - 1901 was released on: USA: January 1901