I will do my best. I'm not sure if there is a such thing as THE debaters argument, but the way I know the phrase is from a Platonic dialogue called the Meno. In it Socrates discusses the nature of virtue, its definition, whether or not it can be taught, etc. At the beginning Meno claims to know what virtue is, but through a series of questions, Socrates proves that Meno does not. Once they both agree neither knows what virtue is, Socrates asks Meno whether or not he would be willing to inquire into the meaning of it with him. This is where the debaters argument comes in. Meno says to Socrates, how will you search for something you do not know? Even if you should find it, how would you know?
Socrates replies, saying (this is where the phrase is used) Meno, do you realize what a debaters argument you have brought up?
(so the debaters argument, at least in this context, is saying one cannot search for what he knows--he already knows it there is no need to search. And one cannot search for what he does not know because he does not know what to search for.)
The debater's argument is the main point or position they are trying to prove or convince others of during a debate. It typically consists of a clear claim or thesis supported by evidence, reasoning, and counterarguments to persuade the audience of their perspective.
No, an argument cannot be void. An argument can be weak, flawed, or unconvincing, but it still retains its basic structure and content. A void argument would imply that there is no argument at all.
The correct spelling of the word is argument.Some example sentences with this word are:There is an argument next door.The political argument wore on for hours.His argument brought up some valid points.
Probably not, but it helps after an argument is settled.
An argument is valid if the conclusion follows logically from the premises. In a valid argument, if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true. This can be determined by evaluating the logical structure of the argument.
If an argument does not commit a fallacy, it means that the reasoning provided supports the conclusion without any logical errors. This indicates that the argument is valid and that the premises lead to a justifiable conclusion. It also suggests that the argument is logically sound and can be considered a strong or persuasive piece of reasoning.
I will do my best. I'm not sure if there is a such thing as THE debaters argument, but the way I know the phrase is from a Platonic dialogue called the Meno. In it Socrates discusses the nature of virtue, its definition, whether or not it can be taught, etc. At the beginning Meno claims to know what virtue is, but through a series of questions, Socrates proves that Meno does not. Once they both agree neither knows what virtue is, Socrates asks Meno whether or not he would be willing to inquire into the meaning of it with him. This is where the debaters argument comes in. Meno says to Socrates, how will you search for something you do not know? Even if you should find it, how would you know? Socrates replies, saying (this is where the phrase is used) Meno, do you realize what a debaters argument you have brought up? (so the debaters argument, at least in this context, is saying one cannot search for what he knows--he already knows it there is no need to search. And one cannot search for what he does not know because he does not know what to search for.)
The duration of The Debaters is 1800.0 seconds.
The duration of The Great Debaters is 2.1 hours.
whats the main setting of the great debaters
The Great Debaters was released on 12/25/2007.
The Production Budget for The Great Debaters was $15,000,000.
The Great Debaters was created on 2007-12-25.
great debaters have prove of there writing and speak for attention .
whats the main setting of the great debaters
That is the correct spelling of the plural word "debaters" (those engaged in debate).
The Great Debaters grossed $30,261,293 worldwide.
The Debate was created on 2005-11-06.