"Subject matter jurisdiction" is the authority of a court to hear cases of a particular type. For Federal Courts, subject matter jurisdiction is limited by Article III, section 2 of the U.S. Constitution, and codified in 28 U.S.C §§ 1331-1332.
Federal courts have subject matter jurisdiction (the authority to hear a case) in two situations:
Subject Matter Jurisdiction in criminal cases always comes under the "federal question" prong: these are violations of the United States Criminal Code. 18 § U.S.C. 3231 applies.
You cannot waive the requirements of subject matter jurisdiction. Rather, these are Constitutional safeguards, ensuring that the federal courts do not gain too much power. The diversity jurisdiction enabling law, however, is particularly helpful for foreign Plaintiffs or Defendants who are afraid of a state judge and jury bias.
Subject Matter Jurisdiction Examples:
A Plaintiff could not bring a suit in federal court if they were asking for $50,000 in damages for negligent driving (this is a tort, which is governed by state law, and there is no "federal question"). However, if the Plaintiff is seeking $100,000 in damages for negligent driving, and the Defendant is from a different state, it would be possible for this Plaintiff to file suit in federal court.
Alternatively, a Plaintiff could sue her employer for merely $100 in federal court if she alleges that her employer discriminated against her and violated Title VII in the United States Code, the Civil Rights Act, or the 14th Amendment, which are all Federal Laws.
Federal courts have subject matter jurisdiction over all matters involving federal law.
Federal district courts have jurisdiction over trials. Federal appeals courts have jurisdiction over appeals from the federal district courts.
Federal district courts have jurisdiction over trials. Federal appeals courts have jurisdiction over appeals from the federal district courts.
Federal district courts have jurisdiction over trials. Federal appeals courts have jurisdiction over appeals from the federal district courts.
Federal district courts have jurisdiction over trials. Federal appeals courts have jurisdiction over appeals from the federal district courts.
Howard P. Fink has written: 'Federal jurisdiction' -- subject(s): Cases, Courts, Jurisdiction 'Federal jurisdiction policy and practice'
Two. The United States Courts of Appeal, and the United States District Courts. Military courts are federal courts of specific subject-matter and personal jurisdiction.
Federal courts of general jurisdiction (US District Courts, etc.) handle both civil and criminal cases.
Federal District Courts have jurisdiction over all federal cases occurring/originating within their circuit. US Courts of Appeal have jurisdiction over all cases referred to them from the District Courts within their circuit.
article 3 of the constitution gives federal courts jurisdiction.
William A. Maury has written: 'The collections and recollections of William A. Maury' 'Federal jurisdiction and procedure' -- subject(s): Courts, Jurisdiction
They are general jurisdiction and federal courts.