0
What is the difference between a priori and a posteriori arguments?
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
A priori means that you can immediately know whether or not it is true. You don't need to check it with your senses. For example: A single is not married. You don't need to see a single to know whether or not he is married.
A posteriori means that you need to check it with your senses to know whether or not it is true. For example: grass is green. When you have nothing but this phrase, you don't know if grass is green.
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
A priori arguments are based on reasoning and deduction prior to gathering empirical evidence, while a posteriori arguments rely on evidence and experience to support their conclusions. A priori arguments are independent of sensory experience, whereas a posteriori arguments depend on sensory experience for validation.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What does a posteriori mean in philosophy?
In philosophy, a posteriori refers to knowledge that is gained through experience or observation. This type of knowledge is empirical, based on evidence gathered from the external world rather than through pure reason alone. A posteriori knowledge is contrasted with a priori knowledge, which is derived from reason and does not require empirical evidence.
Who knows 3 examples of priori knowledge and Empirical knowledge?
Examples of a priori knowledge: mathematical truths (2 + 2 = 4), logical principles (law of non-contradiction), and metaphysical truths (existence of self). Examples of empirical knowledge: scientific theories (laws of gravity), historical facts (World War II ended in 1945), and sensory perceptions (seeing a red apple).
Can thinking and learning be the same thing?
Thinking and learning are related but not the same. Thinking involves processing information in the mind, while learning is the acquisition of new knowledge or skills. Thinking can involve reflecting on what we already know, whereas learning typically involves actively acquiring new information.
What examples does Descartes give of a priori propositions?
Descartes gives examples of a priori propositions in his "Meditations on First Philosophy," such as "I think, therefore I am" (Cogito, ergo sum). This proposition does not rely on sensory experience but is known to be true through reason and self-reflection, making it a priori.
What does aquinas say about the ontological argument?
Aquinas critiques the ontological argument, stating that it is not possible to deduce the existence of God from the concept of a perfect being alone. He argues that we cannot know God's existence simply through reason or definition, but must rely on faith and revelation.
What does it mean for a claim to be a posteriori?
A priori claims are those you can know independent of experience. ... Whereas a priori claims seem to be justified based on pure thought or reason, a posteriori claims are justified based on experience. We can only know a posteriori claims after experience. Here are some a posteriori claims: The triangle is blue.
What is a priori and a posteriori knowledge?
A priori knowledge, in Western philosophy since the time of Immanuel Kant, knowledge that is acquired independently of any particular experience, as opposed to a posteriori knowledge, which is derived from experience.
What is the difference between a priori and a posteriori?
A priori means that you can immediately know whether or not it is true. You don't need to check it with your senses. For example: A single is not married. You don't need to see a single to know whether or not he is married. A posteriori means that you need to check it with your senses to know whether or not it is true. For example: grass is green. When you have nothing but this phrase, you don't know if grass is green.
What is the meaning of a posteriori?
(from the effect to the cause)..Inductive reasoning. Priori- (from the cause to the effect)..Deductive reasoning
What does aquinas say about the ontological argument?
Aquinas critiques the ontological argument, stating that it is not possible to deduce the existence of God from the concept of a perfect being alone. He argues that we cannot know God's existence simply through reason or definition, but must rely on faith and revelation.
True or false A priori arguments are based on reason alone and not data obtained from experience?
true
Who knows 3 examples of priori knowledge and Empirical knowledge?
Examples of a priori knowledge: mathematical truths (2 + 2 = 4), logical principles (law of non-contradiction), and metaphysical truths (existence of self). Examples of empirical knowledge: scientific theories (laws of gravity), historical facts (World War II ended in 1945), and sensory perceptions (seeing a red apple).
Was kierkegaard a empiricist?
No, Søren Kierkegaard was not an empiricist. He is known for his existentialist philosophy that emphasizes individual experience, subjectivity, and the importance of personal choice and commitment. Kierkegaard's works focus on faith, ethics, and the nature of existence rather than empirical observation and scientific inquiry.
Can thinking and learning be the same thing?
Thinking and learning are related but not the same. Thinking involves processing information in the mind, while learning is the acquisition of new knowledge or skills. Thinking can involve reflecting on what we already know, whereas learning typically involves actively acquiring new information.
What is prori analysis and posteriori testing of algorithms?
A priori analysis of an algorithm refers to its time and space complexity analysis using mathematical (algebraic) methods or using a theoritical model such as a finite state machine. (In short, analysis prior to running on real machine.) A posteriori analysis of an algorithm refers to the statistical analysis of its space and time complexity after it is actualy run on a practical machine. (in short, anaysis of its statistics after running it on a real machine)
What do you call the link between harry and Voldemorts wand?
Priori Incantatem
What does a french a mean in English?
"a" is a form of the verb "avoir" (to have) in present tense, as in "il a" (he has). Frequently used with other verbs just like in English ("elle a lu", "she has read"). Or it could be from a Latin expression such as "a priori" or "a posteriori". Foreign expressions are typically printed in italics to make them easier to sort out.
