Want this question answered?
He was in between communism (collectivism) and capitalism (individualism). he had settled on a point of middle ideological thinking.
David A. Kideckel has written: 'The solitude of collectivism' -- subject(s): Collectivism, Post-communism, Social conditions, Socialism and society
A policy he instituted was atheism. He supported communism and collectivism.
Communism and Socialism are the same: a classless stateless society based on production for use).
The same as communism. The belief in collectivism as opposed to individualism. Dictatorship, benevolent or otherwise is still oppressive.
communism was focus on achieving practical political change
See: Communism.
Communism is a form of authoritarian government which was used in the 20th century to implement communism, a system of economic relations where the means of production are given to the proletariat and class distinctions are broken-down.
communist ruled by military democracy "governed" by the people
Communism is a political paradigm that includes economic collectivism but also transfers all the means of production to the state, and eliminates all private property. Economic collectivism itself simply refers to having an eye toward the overall good of the nation (i.e. the people) in economic matters. Economic collectivism can exist in various forms under any political or economic paradigm, including capitalism. If you live in a Western nation and have relied on any form of public assistance or unemployment benefits, you have benefitted from economic collectivism. You may have noticed that it didn't result in communist tanks rolling down your street. In the broader sense, even private charity is a form of economic collectivism. Charity is done as part of a mindset that says "We are all in this together and need to look out for each other." Pretending that economic collectivism is the same as communism is a bad-faith claim. It's is like saying that because cars have headlights, lights themselves are the same as cars. The people who want you to believe this want to keep wealth transferred upward as much as possible.
don't know search on google.com
libertarianism gives people freedom, communism oppresses it. libertarianism creates opportunity, communism takes it away, and communism seeks to destroy the ultimately more fair and efficient free market whereas libertarianism wishes to employ it to progress humanity.