The subject of divine justice (or "theodicy") has been of central concern to Jews, Christians and Muslims for as long as those religions have existed. Traditionally, the negative form of the argument is known as the "evidential argument from evil," and it states that the existence of a good, all-powerful divine being is incompatible with the degrees and kinds of evil found in the world. Several main categories of response have been attempted
Answer 1:
Human law is crafted for society by through a royal, republic, totalitarian, or democratic system. Divine law is individuals or groups who to a divinity. Mosses, Muhammad, Jesus, David Koresh, Jim Jones, David Berkowitz espoused divine law, clearly with varying degrees of reliability and credibility.
NB Siddhartha Gautama (Buddha) was a enlighten spiritual teacher not a God nor a representative of God.
Constitutional fathers, Magna Carta, Decloration of Independence, Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the United Nations create human law.
Answer 2:
From a spiritual perspective, human law is fallible, divine law is infallible.
From a more mundane perspective, divine law is typically the things that everyone knows anyway. No one really has to be sat and told why killing and stealing are wrong.
Human law is for the stuff that we wouldn't know was wrong unless a legislator told us it would. Like not adding a bedroom to your home without paying for a permit. Or not selling your body for sexual use, or using certain recreational substances.
In "Antigone" by Sophocles, the conflict between divine authority (as represented by the gods' laws and Antigone's duty to bury her brother) and human authority (as represented by King Creon's decree) is resolved through tragedy. The play explores the consequences of defying human law in favor of divine law, ultimately showing the limits of human authority when it contradicts the will of the gods. Both Creon and Antigone suffer for their rigid adherence to their respective beliefs, leading to a realization of the importance of finding a balance between divine and human authority.
Divine law is set forth by what we know in the bible, its the word of god. As a Christian theologian he sees gods word as the ultimate power. Therefore even though human law can be virtuous this is only the case when it influenced by divine law.
According to Thomas Aquinas, the four types of laws are eternal law (divine reason governing the universe), natural law (moral principles inherent in human nature), human law (civil laws created by governments), and divine law (revealed through religious texts).
* rule of law, * juditial review* ,quasi theological term, * natura law[divine law] * ,highest ann unlimited power* ,making law, constitutional limitation
Revealed law is based on divine revelation or religious texts, such as the Ten Commandments in Judaism and Christianity, while natural law is derived from reason and observation of the natural world. Revealed law is seen as absolute and unchanging, while natural law is believed to be inherent in human nature and applicable to all people.
Antinomianism.
In short: Subject is something with human qualities and the object does not have human qualities, in other words, people are subjects of law and property, animals, etc. are objects of law.
There is no difference. They are the same.
the difference is this is small and that is big
ord lo!
I'm not sure what is meant by "God's Eternal Law". Is that another way of saying "Divine law"? Divine law is the law of God -- as opposed to natural law and man-made laws. God has worked though man to perform miracles and wonders.
None.