0
What is the difference between a transmission electron microscope and transmission positron microscope?
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
The primary difference is that the transmission electron microscope has been invented and developed, and is in wide use. The transmission positron microscope is still a curiosity. Another difference is the obvious one. The transmission electron microscope uses electrons and the transmission positron microscope uses positrons. There are some serious technical issues that must be solved to gather a bunch of positrons, slow them down and then craft them into a beam. Just so you know. And then there's all that annoying gamma radiation that results from the annihilation of the positrons when they recombine with an electron. To have a sufficient quantity of positrons to create a usable beam would result in a high radiation load. The positrons are going to undergo mutual annihilation with an electron, remember? Two hot gamma rays will be exiting the annihilation event. Using the instrument will create some high levels of radiation, and might make it advisable to operate the device from across town.
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoIn one of them a positron is emitted. In the other an electron is captured.
Since positrons are the antiparticles of electrons, it can be difficult in some cases to sort out which of these has actually occurred. Given the preponderance of electrons in normal matter, either way the net effect is going to be that an electron goes missing somewhere, either because it was "captured" or because it was annihilated when the positron ran into it.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Compare and contrast transmission electron microscopes and transmission positron microscpes?
O
What is the anti-matter equivalent of an electron?
No. The antiparticle for the proton is called antiproton. The antiparticle for the electron is called antielectron, also known as positron.
What the difference between positive and negative electrons?
an electron always has a negative chargea positron is identical in all respects to an electron (sometimes it is called a "positive electron"), except it always has a positive charge and is antimatter (not matter)If an electron and a positron meet they will both cease to exist (annihilation) and gamma ray photons will be created.
The rest mass energy of an electron positron pair is?
Twice the mass of the electron, since the positron has the same mass of the electron. Or the equivalent, in energy units.An electron has a mass or energy of 511 keV.
What is the symbol for a positron?
A positron is the antiparticle of the electron. We write the electron as e- as it is negatively charged. We write e+ or β+ for the positron. The latter symbol uses the Greek letter beta as positron emission is one of the two forms of the radioactive decay known as beta decay. Links can be found below.
Compare and contrast transmission electron microscopes and transmission positron microscpes?
O
What is the antiparticle of a positron?
Since the positron is the antiparticle of the electron, it follows that the electron is the antiparticle of the positron.
Does positron have a negative charge?
A POSITron has a POSITive charge, hence the name. A positron is an anti-electron; since the electron has a negative charge, the positron has a positive charge.A POSITron has a POSITive charge, hence the name. A positron is an anti-electron; since the electron has a negative charge, the positron has a positive charge.A POSITron has a POSITive charge, hence the name. A positron is an anti-electron; since the electron has a negative charge, the positron has a positive charge.A POSITron has a POSITive charge, hence the name. A positron is an anti-electron; since the electron has a negative charge, the positron has a positive charge.
Why are transmission positron microscope and acoustic microscope important for understanding how living cells function?
Because only the Transmission Position Microscopes and the Acoustic Microscopes are able to magnify living specimen while the Electron Microscope has the major disadvantage of only being able to magnify dried, frozen, and dead specimen. We also wouldn't be able to learn much about living cells.
What is the antimatter version of an electron?
positron
What is the difference between a positron and electron and a nutrino?
A positron is like an electron in every way but charge, electrons having -1, positrons having +1. In other words, they're a positron is an electron's antiparticle. Neutrinos are chargeless, pointlike, nearly massless particles associated with electron and positron decays that exist in order to preserve the conservation of energy, momentum and angular momentum in these decay processes.
How is a positron different from an electron?
A positron is an electron's antiparticle. It has the same mass as an electron, but an opposite electrical charge.
What is the difference between a positron and an electron?
An electron is the carrier of the negative electrostatic force, and it has a charge of -1. Also, the electron, along with the proton and neutron, are the "basic building blocks" of atoms, and they make up the matter all around us. The positron, on the other hand, is an anti-electron - it's antimatter! And it is the antiparticle of the electron. It has a charge of +1, which is just the opposite of the electron's. The fact that the electron and positron are matter and anti-matter, and that they have a charge of -1 and +1 respectively are the major differences. A positron is an electron's anti-particle, and when the electron and positron come in contact with each other to combine, they annihilate each other in a process called electron-positron annihilation. There is a link below to that related question and to a couple of others.
What is the anti-matter equivalent of an electron?
No. The antiparticle for the proton is called antiproton. The antiparticle for the electron is called antielectron, also known as positron.
Why does antimatter anihilate matter and Would a positron anihilate a muon or a quark?
A positron is the antiparticle of an electron; in other words, it is an alternate name for the "anti-electron". Therefore, a positron would anihilate with an electron. I am not sure about the "why".
Why are transmission positron microscope and acoustic microscopes important tools for understanding how living cells function?
Because only the Transmission Position Microscopes and the Acoustic Microscopes are able to magnify living specimen while the Electron Microscope has the major disadvantage of only being able to magnify dried, frozen, and dead specimen. We also wouldn't be able to learn much about living cells.
How do positron emission and electron capture change an atom?
After positron emission or electron capture the atomic number is decreased with one.
