There is one direct object, which is the phrase "a lunch or dinner of worms". The structure of this direct object phrase is: article ("a"), noun ("lunch or dinner"), noun complement ("of worms"). The noun plus noun complement is a shortened version of "lunch of worms or dinner of worms". The "of" phrases express the logical objects of the verbs corresponding to "lunch" and "dinner", namely the verbs "lunch" and "dine".
Thus, another way of expressing the same thought would be: "Most fish enjoy lunching on worms or dining on worms."
In this sentence, the word 'worms' is the direct object as it is the object that is directly affected by the action.
The verb does not have a direct object in the sentence, "She is insecure."
There is no direct object in that sentence.
The direct object in the sentence "His father walks with a limp" is "a limp."
There is no direct object in that sentence.
There is no direct object in this sentence.
In the sentence 'you have her a surprise gift', 'her' is an indirect object. 'Gift' is the direct object in that sentence.
Yes, and very often. Example: "This sentence has a direct object." where object is the D.O.
That sentence does not contain a direct object.
"song" is the direct object in that sentence.
Personality is the direct object in that sentence.
In grammar, technique can serve as either a direct object or an indirect object, depending on how it is used in a sentence. For example, in the sentence "She taught me a new technique," "me" is the indirect object and "a new technique" is the direct object.
In the sentence "Your visit to the museum was educational", "visit" is the direct object. An indirect object would typically receive the direct object, such as in the sentence "I gave her a gift" where "her" is the indirect object receiving the direct object "gift".