0
What is the idea that judges should give decisions to lawmakers called?
Superd6969
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
The idea that judges should allow the decisions of other branches to stand is called?
Judicial restraint
According to the doctrine of judicial restraint the judiciary should?
the doctrine of judicial restrain holds that judges should generally defer to precedent and to decisions made by legislature
Do you believe local judges should run for office as independent candidates or on a party ticket Why as a democrat or republican?
Local judges should run independent of a party ticket so that they are not beholden to a party to make decisions in their favor. Also, every decision should be based on the merits of that case and not be looked at based on political reasons.
What appellate judges look for when they review cASE?
Generally Appellate Judges are not looking for anything when they review a case. An appeal lawyer has presented his reasons why the appellate court should grant relief for his client. He lists the reasons on his brief. It refers to specific lines on transcript and to relevant case law. The judges read his brief. The opponent's attorney (prosecutor if criminal or plaintiff if civil) may enter his brief and explains why the other lawyer is wrong. The Appellate Judges examine the arguments and make their decision. (A lot of the work is done by law clerks just out of law school. They check the legal references in the law library or on line. Then they bring the relevant ones to the judges with their suggested decisions. The Judges read the clerks conclusions but make their own decisions.
What do appellate judges look for when they review case?
Generally Appellate Judges are not looking for anything when they review a case. An appeal lawyer has presented his reasons why the appellate court should grant relief for his client. He lists the reasons on his brief. It refers to specific lines on transcript and to relevant case law. The judges read his brief. The opponent's attorney (prosecutor if criminal or plaintiff if civil) may enter his brief and explains why the other lawyer is wrong. The Appellate Judges examine the arguments and make their decision. (A lot of the work is done by law clerks just out of law school. They check the legal references in the law library or on line. Then they bring the relevant ones to the judges with their suggested decisions. The Judges read the clerks conclusions but make their own decisions.
The idea that representatives should listen to their constituents opinions and then use their best judgment to make decisions is called?
trustees
What do appellate judges look for when they review a case?
Generally Appellate Judges are not looking for anything when they review a case. An appeal lawyer has presented his reasons why the appellate court should grant relief for his client. He lists the reasons on his brief. It refers to specific lines on transcript and to relevant case law. The judges read his brief. The opponent's attorney (prosecutor if criminal or plaintiff if civil) may enter his brief and explains why the other lawyer is wrong. The Appellate Judges examine the arguments and make their decision. (A lot of the work is done by law clerks just out of law school. They check the legal references in the law library or on line. Then they bring the relevant ones to the judges with their suggested decisions. The Judges read the clerks conclusions but make their own decisions.
Should Federal Judges only interpret existing laws or should they be able to create new laws?
No, federal judges should not be able to create new laws since that's the job of the legislature. Judges should only interpret existing laws instead of trying to write them.
Should Christians fight for social justice?
Christians can work for justice. However, Christians should only do so if that is where the LORD has called them to be. The Bible does say not to judge. On the other hand, it is better to have Christians be judges over those that do not follow God. This is because God-driven decisions will have the best outcome. One piece of evident proof that godly judges should work for justice is King Solomon, son of David. Solomon was blessed with godly wisdom. He asked for help in ruling the people of Israel, and God poured out wisdom upon him. He made righteous choices that were God-driven, and the outcome was always just. As their decisions are rooted in faith, Christians should work for justice if God calls them to do so.
Can a debt collector garnish your wage without letting you know first?
No. You should receive a letter in the mail/ a summons to court. If u don't show up you will not know about the judges decisions. Show up and tell the judge why you could not pay.
Unlike legislators federal judges should?
be impartial
Should judges make laws or should it be left to Parliament?
o yes
