0
What else can I help you with?
The judicial doctrine that government cannot prohibit speech or publication before the fact is called?
Prior Restraint
How does judicial activism and judicial restraint affect the separation of powers?
Judicial activism weakens the separation of powers by involving the Court in what are traditionally executive and legislative functions. Judicial restraint reinforces separation of powers.
Who is is an example of a justice who advocated judicial restraint?
felix frankfurter
Compare Judicial Restraint and Judicial Activism?
Judicial restraint is the theory that judges should limit their exercise of power and strike down laws only when they are obviously unconstitutional, and always follow precedents set by older courts. Judicial activism is the opposite view, and is sometimes meant to imply politically motivated judicial decisions.
Which branch of government decides the meaning of the laws?
The judicial branch <-------Apex;)
Opposition to the judiciary's creative policy making role is a consistent tenet of judicial what?
restraint
Opposition to the judiciary's creative policy making role is a consistent tenet of judicial?
restraint
The judicial doctrine that government cannot prohibit speech or publication before the fact is called?
Prior Restraint
Federalist paper no. 78?
=explains and praises the provisions of te judiciary and outlines the doctrine of judicial review=
Which constitutional principle does judicial review reflect?
Judicial review is the doctrine under which legislative and executive actions are subject to review (and possible invalidation) by the judiciary
What is John P Roche's idea on judicial self restraint?
Please view Chapter 9 The Judiciary -Dr Cash's AP US Government & Politics
What are the two schools of thought about judicial review?
The two primary schools of thought regarding judicial review are judicial activism and judicial restraint. Judicial activism advocates for a robust role of the judiciary in interpreting the Constitution and often supports overturning laws or executive actions that are seen as unjust or unconstitutional, emphasizing the court's role in protecting individual rights. In contrast, judicial restraint emphasizes a more limited role for the judiciary, advocating that courts should defer to the decisions of the legislative and executive branches unless there is a clear violation of the Constitution, thus promoting stability and respect for democratic processes.
Does Sandra Day O'Connor show Judicial activism or judicial restraint?
Sandra Day O'Connor is often seen as a proponent of judicial restraint, as she typically emphasized the importance of adhering to precedent and the principle of judicial modesty. However, her decisions occasionally reflected a pragmatic approach that could be interpreted as judicial activism, particularly in cases involving civil rights and women's rights. Overall, her judicial philosophy balanced these two approaches, demonstrating a nuanced understanding of the role of the judiciary.
What Judicial philosophy states that the court should uphold acts of the Congress unless acts violate specific provisions of the Constitution?
Judicial restraint. The opposite of judicial restraint is judicial activism.For more information about the controversy over judicial activism and judicial restraint, see Related Questions, below.
What is a sentence using judiciary in it?
Another word for JUDICIARY is judicial
Was Gore v Bush judicial restraint or overreach?
It did not seem to be judicial activism as there wasn't a larger issue at hand. Rather, the final decision appears historically to be judicial partisanship.
How does judicial activism and judicial restraint affect the separation of powers?
Judicial activism weakens the separation of powers by involving the Court in what are traditionally executive and legislative functions. Judicial restraint reinforces separation of powers.
