policy representation
Trustees
With the trustee model, there is a chance that the representative will act for the benefit of his or her own interests as opposed to the interests of his or her constituents. With the delegate model, there is a chance that the representative will not make the best decision for his constituency as a whole and ignore the minority as well.
If a judge appoints a minor an attorney to represent their best interests in court, the attorney is usually referred to as the "Guardian Ad Litem".
using group members to contact legislators
An appointed official does of course not have constituents. As to who would do a better job in serving the public: an elected official would feel bound to work towards the wishes and preferences of the people who voted for him/her. But that would not automatically mean that he would serve the general public better: given for instance a voter turnout of 40% and a majority of 51%, he might only look after the interests of no more than 21% of the general public. An appointed official would feel bound to serve the best interests of all the people.
To get the very best gift for a dad, think about what his interests are and get him a gift that is related to his interests.
Yes. However, an attorney could represent your best interests better than you can.Yes. However, an attorney could represent your best interests better than you can.Yes. However, an attorney could represent your best interests better than you can.Yes. However, an attorney could represent your best interests better than you can.
suspension
A delegate
NHL first adopted the commissioner to govern the best interests of the sport.
Not in My Best Interests
how does this have to do with relationships :)