I would suppose it has a negative effect.
Answer: Vegetarianism.Answer: A balance of meat and vegetables is healthier for the human race.
Not if they take their vegetarianism seriously.
No... according to wikipedia's vegetarianism article, "Vegetarianism is the practice of a diet that excludes all meat, including poultry, game, fish, shellfish or crustacea, and slaughter by-products."However, there are variations within vegetarianism; some people abstain from all meat except for fish, for example.
easy, its simply the biochemical reaction within the analrectum to provide benefits of vegetarianism
Mark Warren Reinhardt has written: 'The perfectly contented meat-eater's guide to vegetarianism' -- subject(s): Vegetarianism, Nutrition
Vegetarians and Vegans, some religions call for Vegetarianism, so naturally people who follow those religions won't eat meat.
Not all sects of Buddhism practice vegetarianism.
Vegetarianism is very good for the environment. Animals produce large amounts of CO2. It also takes a lot more water to produce a kilogram of meat compared to a kilogram of vegetables.
That question doesn't make sense. I think you meant "we" not "be". But we should embrace vegetarianism to save the planet because of the carbon emissions that come from the factories. The more people consume, the more meat they're going to need and will create. Meat is definitely not green.
Buddhism helped promote vegetarianism--the practice of ahimsa, or nonviolence.
That's not really relevant to vegetarianism since it's more about choices within that. For example a vegetarian who eats a lot of sweets will have just as bad teeth as a non-vegetarian. Sometimes vegetarianism has no impact one way or the other any more than how tall you are or eye colour has an impact.
Animals are affected by vegetarianism as well as the environment and the people who partake in vegetarianism.