Want this question answered?
Atomic not Atomis!
Argue that a new government was necessary to protect the rights of the people.
The money raised by Proposition B will unlikely go to improving the roads.
resources were being taken away from poverty programs.
the colonists did not want to be taxed directly by parliament
Third speaker of affirmative:1. Speaks after second Negative.2. Concludes argument of Affirmative team.3. Rebuts arguements of second Negative and whole Negative team.4. Summarises whole argument of Affirmative team.Third speaker of negative:1. Speaks after third affirmative.2. Stresses main points of negative argument. (Cannot raise any new points)3. Rebuts arguements of third affirmative, and whole affirmative team.4. Summarises whole argument of Negative team.I hope this helps
Third speaker of affirmative:1. Speaks after second Negative.2. Concludes argument of Affirmative team.3. Rebuts arguements of second Negative and whole Negative team.4. Summarises whole argument of Affirmative team.Third speaker of negative:1. Speaks after third affirmative.2. Stresses main points of negative argument. (Cannot raise any new points)3. Rebuts arguements of third affirmative, and whole affirmative team.4. Summarises whole argument of Negative team.I hope this helps (-:
America succeeded to implement the affirmative action because it had great support from the citizens. The main aim was to help curb discrimination in America.
As it stands today in the US, affirmative action policies are not a main point of discussion. There are several reasons why. One is that the programs did not work very well. The other is that, aside, from recessions, discrimination in hiring practices is rare and against the law. The topic is controversial.
As far as I am aware, there is no logical, coherent argument against healthy eating.
Federalists wanted to urge the Constitution to be in action, but the Anti-Federalists didn't want the Constitution to be in commencement. They were against it.
A balanced argument presents multiple perspectives on an issue, acknowledges opposing views, supports claims with evidence or reasoning, and strives for fairness and objectivity in its presentation. It aims to provide a comprehensive and nuanced discussion of the topic at hand.
astronomy
The main argument against pork-barrel legislation is that it leads to wasteful government spending by allocating funds based on political favors rather than merit or need. This can result in resources being misallocated and projects being undertaken for reasons other than their actual value or benefit to society. Additionally, pork-barrel spending can contribute to corruption and undermine public trust in government.
The main argument against the South's desire to secede from the union is the boundary issue. There is a boundary issue on where the boundary should actually be.
cause they can and they felt like it
they didn't get to practice the Bill of Rights