At this point in time (2012) Iran is believed to have no nuclear weapons capability at all. However this could end at any time (at which point Iran would be nuclear weapons capable).
Israel is the only nation in the Middle East known to have nuclear weapons.
America is opposed to Iran having nuclear weapons because we see their country as unstable and if they were allowed to have nuclear weapon capability they would either use it against us or sell them to radical terrorist group. At least that's what we believe.
Does the U.S. have nuclear weapons? Yes there are five countries that obtained nuclear weapons in the aftermath of the Second World War: U.S., Great Britain, Russia, China, and France. These five signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty to stop the expand of nuclear weapons. In the '70s both India and Pakistan began acquiring nuclear capability. North Korea, Iran, and Israel are controversial countries that are unkown for having yet obtained, but having hinted, at control of nuclear capability. I say nobody should have them.
Iran does not at this time have any nuclear weapons, but could easily build a few in the next couple of years. There is no real secret about building fission type nuclear explosives. The main limiting factor is access to weapons grade uranium and/or plutonium.
Australia's view about Iran having nuclear , Australia does not support that because If Iran had their Nuclear weapons they will threat the world, and will cause an nuclear race in the Arab nations witch will lead to WW3
No. If Iran were to build 3-5 nuclear weapons they could, although they would undoubtedly be destroyed in the process by Israeli nukes and US nukes. However, there is no evidence that Iran is pursuing a nuclear weapons program and no evidence that Iran hates another state enough to see its 5,000 year old civilization destroyed in the process. In essence, Iran does not currently have the capability, and even if it had the capability the assertion that it would do so is dubious. (except for the incidental fact that its president has stated publicly "the zionist cancer must be wiped off the map" etc.)
because of their nuclear weapons and protests
Yes. Bashar Al-Assad and his government support a nuclear-armed Iran. However, Syrians toe the Iranian line and claim that the program is only for nuclear power and not weapons.
I have no intention of dropping nuclear bombs on Iran. As far as national governments go, it seems that if there will be any military strike on Iran, it will be with conventional weapons.
because obama is secretly from iran
it is quite unfair to say that having nuclear weapons with IRAN is dangerous because when pakistan is nuclear armed country and other nations are equipped with this nuclear facility because if IRAN is acquiring nuclear energy for gud purpose, then we shud not stop IRAN from achieving its energy purpose.
Afghanistan has not argued that it wants nuclear weapons.