It means there are 4 full bathrooms and 1 partial bathroom in the property.
OK, Roman baths were big because most of them were public baths, meaning that if there was a public bath site somewhere everyone could just go and take a bath there and lots of people went so they had to be pretty big.
yes they did have baths the Tudors didn't have baths.
If I remember correctly, it is the following: FIRST the number of bedrooms- THEN the number of full baths- AND LASTLY the number of half baths (no shower or tub, just sink and toilet)
Yes, many of the wealthy had baths in their houses.Yes, many of the wealthy had baths in their houses.Yes, many of the wealthy had baths in their houses.Yes, many of the wealthy had baths in their houses.Yes, many of the wealthy had baths in their houses.Yes, many of the wealthy had baths in their houses.Yes, many of the wealthy had baths in their houses.Yes, many of the wealthy had baths in their houses.Yes, many of the wealthy had baths in their houses.
The number 41 is a prime number meaning, it only has two factors, one and itself. So, the factors of 41 are: 1x41 ~Cassie
41 is a prime number meaning that only one can go into it's self and no other number
4 baths plus 6 baths, perhaps!
They used the public baths to socialize and bathe.They used the public baths to socialize and bathe.They used the public baths to socialize and bathe.They used the public baths to socialize and bathe.They used the public baths to socialize and bathe.They used the public baths to socialize and bathe.They used the public baths to socialize and bathe.They used the public baths to socialize and bathe.They used the public baths to socialize and bathe.
It depends upon the size of the bath. The Roman baths were built in various sizes from the small baths in private homes, to the vast imperial baths, such a those of Diocletian and Caracalla.It depends upon the size of the bath. The Roman baths were built in various sizes from the small baths in private homes, to the vast imperial baths, such a those of Diocletian and Caracalla.It depends upon the size of the bath. The Roman baths were built in various sizes from the small baths in private homes, to the vast imperial baths, such a those of Diocletian and Caracalla.It depends upon the size of the bath. The Roman baths were built in various sizes from the small baths in private homes, to the vast imperial baths, such a those of Diocletian and Caracalla.It depends upon the size of the bath. The Roman baths were built in various sizes from the small baths in private homes, to the vast imperial baths, such a those of Diocletian and Caracalla.It depends upon the size of the bath. The Roman baths were built in various sizes from the small baths in private homes, to the vast imperial baths, such a those of Diocletian and Caracalla.It depends upon the size of the bath. The Roman baths were built in various sizes from the small baths in private homes, to the vast imperial baths, such a those of Diocletian and Caracalla.It depends upon the size of the bath. The Roman baths were built in various sizes from the small baths in private homes, to the vast imperial baths, such a those of Diocletian and Caracalla.It depends upon the size of the bath. The Roman baths were built in various sizes from the small baths in private homes, to the vast imperial baths, such a those of Diocletian and Caracalla.
they dont take baths
they do not take baths
The name of the Roman baths was thermae. Only in the city of Rome, where there were many baths, there were distinctive names for baths: the Baths of Agrippa, the Baths of Nero, the Thermae Etrusci, the Baths of Titus, the Baths of Domitian, the Baths of Trajan, the Baths of Caracalla and the Baths of Diocletian. Thermae Etrusci is a term coined by historians. They were commissioned by Claudius Etruscus, a freedman at the court of the emperor Claudius who became the head of the imperial financial administration.