The president of the United States is elected by the electoral college. What type of system is this?
The possible harm to the balance of nature is more important than a gain in energy
Air and water pollution
Well, most arguments against it are based on the environmental impacts as well as the potential of offshore drilling to discourage alternative energy. However, if drilling standards (including site planning, construction, resource retrieval and clean-up response) are made to be environmentally conscious (how much so? the difficulity is in the details) then offshore drilling is not necessarily bad. Due to growing energy demands, alternative energy is still an area of great research and experimentation of which we are beginning to implement in our infrastructure and society. Although some discourage alternative energy in lieu of oil drilling due to political reasons (and vice-versa), there is room for both energy methods to be implemented succesfully. Well, most arguments against it are based on the environmental impacts as well as the potential of offshore drilling to discourage alternative energy. However, if drilling standards (including site planning, construction, resource retrieval and clean-up response) are made to be environmentally conscious (how much so? the difficulity is in the details) then offshore drilling is not necessarily bad. Due to growing energy demands, alternative energy is still an area of great research and experimentation of which we are beginning to implement in our infrastructure and society. Although some discourage alternative energy in lieu of oil drilling due to political reasons (and vice-versa), there is room for both energy methods to be implemented succesfully.
because the nation wide has a clear majority of norwegains against oil drilling
One argument against Immigration was that immigrants were evil.
A counter argument is an argument made against another argument.
One argument against immigration was that immigrants were evil.
Im against offshore drilling and proenviornment but oil should not be banned at least until we have an alternate source that can do everything that oil does and cost less. Modern technology could not exist with out oil. no one is even considering banningoil it is an unreasonable idea.Why should offshore drilling be banned? Well, should smoking be banned? Should dogs be banned? Banning a product NEVER does any good. Look at prohibition. Many were killed. If we ban oil there'll be rioting in the streets
An Argument Against Abolishing Christianity was created in 1708.
The high cost and the effect on the environment (i.e. the marine life will be damaged in the nearby ocean).
There will be way more fuel on hand... more fuel... less $ at the pumpThere will be much less dependency on foreign countries (that we finance so they can buy weapons to use against us)Less conflicts about trade and money in the Middle East.
As far as I am aware, there is no logical, coherent argument against healthy eating.