The noun clause is 'what happened next' which is functioning as the object of the preposition 'at'.
The noun clause in the sentence is "what happened next," as it functions as the object of the preposition "at."
The subject in this sentence is "The stern judge." This is because the judge is the one performing the action of ruling in the sentence.
Sure! Here is an example sentence using the word "judge": "It is not fair to judge someone based on their appearance alone."
When the verdict is guilty, the judge determines the defendant's sentence based on the relevant laws and sentencing guidelines. The judge takes into consideration factors such as the nature of the crime, any previous criminal record, and any mitigating or aggravating circumstances. The judge issues a sentence that they deem appropriate based on these factors.
A discretionary sentence is a type of sentence imposed by a judge within a specified range, allowing the judge the flexibility to consider various factors and circumstances surrounding the case before determining the final sentence. This type of sentence gives judges the discretion to tailor the punishment to fit the individual circumstances of the case.
The past progressive tense of "judge" is "was judging" or "were judging" depending on the subject of the sentence.
The noun clause is 'what happened next'. The relative pronoun 'what' is taking the place of a noun; the clause 'what happened next' is the object of the preposition 'at'.
A noun clause containing a relative clause is a type of sentence structure where a relative clause, which provides additional information about a noun, functions as the subject or object of the sentence. For example, "The book that you lent me is excellent" has a noun clause "that you lent me" containing the relative clause "that you lent me."
The noun clause, "whatever you tell me" is not a complete sentence. Without the rest of the sentence, we don't know how it's functioning in the sentence.Some examples are:Whatever you tell me is our secret. (the clause is the subject of the sentence)I won't judge you for whatever you tell me. (the clause is the object of the preposition 'for')
A clause is basically any kind of phrase within (or as) a sentence. There are independent and dependent clauses. An independent clause is any phrase that can stand alone as its own sentence. For instance, in the sentence "Jane and I were walking when we saw the dog," the first portion "Jane and I were walking" would be an independent clause. A dependent clause, however, doesn't make sense when taken out of the sentence; it is therefore dependent on the sentence as a whole. For instance, "when we saw the dog" would be a dependent clause (here, a prepositional phrase to be more specific) because it does not have the necessary elements of a sentence that an independent clause has.
Sure! Here is an example sentence using the word "judge": "It is not fair to judge someone based on their appearance alone."
No. If the defendant was found not guilty WHAT would the judge sentence them for?
I don't believe the Morals Clause holds anymore weight than anything else. It will depend on the Judge and the details of why you are seeking the clause. Unfortunately, the courts are given "discretion" to rule however they see fit. If you happen to have a conservative Judge, chances are higher than if you were to have a liberal Judge. That, of course, is my own opinion.
Yes, capitalize "judge" in the middle of a sentence if it is part of a proper noun or title like "Word Judge" in this case.
This is a sentence. A prisoner has to serve the sentence the judge gives him.
A dependent clause is a clause (subject and predicate) that cannot form a sentence by itself. An example would be: "When I went to the store" --this clause has a subject and verb, but the word "when" makes it dependent on more information. Another example would be "Although she felt sad"--it needs another clause to make it a complete sentence.
the judge was merciless when delivering the sentence.
I am training to be a garden judge.