ambot ninyo dli diay mo ka answer
paullette gorgeous ^_^
airplanes are not scientific views, and certainly not scientific views.
Scientists typically publish their views on classifications in peer-reviewed scientific journals, present their findings at conferences, and engage in discussions with other scientists in the field. This allows for a thorough exchange of ideas, feedback, and critiques among scientific peers.
Explanations must be Consistent. The explanation for one set of phenomena cannot contradict the explanation for other sets of phenomena. If explanations are inconsistent, they must be rectified or abandoned. Explanations must be Testable. Explanations must be examined in laboratories, in nature, in the field or through the study of past events and must be capable of shown to be incorrect. If they are incorrect they must be changed or abandoned. Preferred Explanations should be Elegant (Simple). Explanations that require the invention of the fewest "missing pieces" have the greatest reliability. Explanations cannot include pieces that are either inconsistent with what is already known or that are untestable.
Scientific research has shown that smoking is extremely harmful.
Alexander Fleming's political views are not well-documented, as he was primarily known for his scientific work, particularly for his discovery of penicillin. Any specific political views he may have had are not widely known or significant in the context of his scientific contributions.
AnswerMany theists believe that the world was created just as the Bible says, and refuse to accept any evidence to the contrary. They have a considerable effect on views of others on how the world was created. There is no atheist creed as to how the world was created. Of course, atheists know that the biblical creation account is not correct, but they are generally open to non-theistic explanations and would find the scientific explanation persuasive.Agnostics, by definition, are uncertain whether there is a God. They may believe that if there is a God it is possible that the biblical account could be correct, but probably in most cases side with the scientific explanation.
Personal beliefs or opinions are not a result of scientific theory. Scientific theories are based on empirical evidence and reasoning, not on subjective views or perspectives.
Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection provided a comprehensive explanation for the diversity of life on Earth. It laid the foundation for modern evolutionary biology by demonstrating how species change over time in response to their environment. Darwin's work continues to be central to scientific understanding of evolution and has shaped modern views on the mechanisms driving the process.
An explanation is informative, while an argument is persuasive.
To get more views, tell your friends, family, and any other people and tell them to tell other people to get more views.
Scientific debates let scientists work out different views. Debates present differing ideas and views with that scientist's "scientific evidence", but scientists do not always agree and cannot always resolve the problem(s). Debates are like a think tank. They generate more ideas than declaring one solution or answer.