Judicial Review
Judicial review
Courts
Yes - assuming it is within that courts jurisdiction to deal with that law. They are more likely however to declare specific sections invalid, as usually the case before them will not deal with the whole act. (Remember - judges are there to settle the dispute in front of them, if their case neednt reference a section, they wont touch it)
Checks and balance
The Marshall Court set the precedent that US laws could be devalidated if they were found to violate the US Constitution and gave the courts this power.
I think it means it did not pass or was invalid. that the courts cancelled it in a way. I think it means it did not pass or was invalid. that the courts cancelled it in a way.
The federal courts can check the Presidents power by that courts can declare executive actions unconstitutional.
They hear cases that violate your US Constitutional rights.
Supreme Court to declare acts of Congress and state laws unconstitutional
The power of the supreme court to declare a law "unconstitutional" is called Judicial Review. No part of the constitution actually grants this power explicitly to the Supreme Court, but the case of Marbury vs. Madison established this power and has been the accepted precedent for granting the Supreme Court the power of Judicial Review ever since.
Some people have argued that printing 'In God We Trust' on U.S. currency is unconstitutional. Courts, however, have ruled that it does not in fact violate the Constitution.
The Judicial Branch. If a person or group feels that a law passed by Congress is unconstitutional, they can challenge the constitutionality of the law in the courts. This process is called judicial review.
"The federal courts can check the Presidents How_can_Federal_Court_check_the_presidents_powerby that courts can declare executive actions unconstitutional."