Yes and no. With the knowledge that the people had about the atomic bomobs back then, it was justified. It got rid of WWII quickly without killing millions of Japanese and Americans. However, they had no idea of the damages that would happen to innocent people and the environment because of the radiation that came from it. Nowadays, we know better
President Truman consulted with Gen. Douglas MacArthur, Supreme Commander in the Pacific theater. The general was an expert on casualty expectations on planned operations and he was usually right. He was asked during the planning stages of the upcoming assault on Japan home islands. He predicted 11 million Japanese casualties, military and armed civilians would occur on the landing beaches or closeby inland. He predicted also 1.5 million Allied casualties The Japanese were warned that a new ghastly weapon would be used on them unless they surrendered unconditionally. After Nagasaki the surrendered with one condition, that the Emperor remain. The Allies agreed. My ship was ready to take part in the invasion as we had in nine previous invasions of Japanese held islands. For the first time we were issued gas masks because the Japanese military was expected to use poison gas on those landing on their sacred soil. Hiroshima and Nagasaki can be attributed to Japan militarists, not the Enola Gay. Most Military Historians agree, If there had been no surprise attack on Pearl Harbor there would not have been the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
1. To end the war with Japan without wasting any more lives in combat.
2. To allow Allied air support to drop medical supplies and food to Chinese suffering from the Japanese occupation. This saved millions of innocent lives, much more than were lost to the bombings.
3. I think that is reason enough.
It was thought at the time that if the war continued to its logical conclusion that the Japanese military would fight to the last man to defend their homeland, even if central Japanese command was killed or captured. It was estimated that in order to defeat the Japanese following a land assault at least a million more lives would be lost after an invasion of Japan, including both allied troops and Japanese civilians.
The use of atomic bombs against Japan in 1945 was a strategic decision, to end the war more rapidly. The USSR had declared war on Japan 3 weeks previously, and was moving in to seize Japanese territory, just as they were in the process of taking over all of eastern Europe. Even now, in 2012, Russia still has control of one small Japanese island, seized in 1945 (which is a continuing source of friction between the two countries). The US wanted to end the war before there was too much Soviet involvement.
To end the war in the Pacific.
To save American lives by ending the war sooner - apex
The second - of two - atomic bombs dropped on Japan was dropped on August 9th, 1945 on Nagasaki.
hiroshima, Japan
The atomic bombings of Japan took place in August of 1945. While there were numerous nuclear tests on U.S. soil, no atomic bomb was dropped on the U.S. Japan is the only country to have suffered such an attack.
The atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki RB
The President wanted to end the war and to collapse Japan's means to make war again.
Yes
To end the war and to collapse Japan's means to make war.
not alot for some reason
Hiroshima Japan
Yes but in Japan.
To end the war quickly and avoid more of the allies loses.
It was dropped by the United States by orders of President Truman over Hiroshima, Japan.
To end the war and to collapse Japan's means to make war.
The second - of two - atomic bombs dropped on Japan was dropped on August 9th, 1945 on Nagasaki.
If the tested bomb had not worked it is likely they would have tried dropping the other bombs.If Japan had surrender prior to the dates the bombs were to be dropped then the bombs would not have been dropped on Japan.
Japan never dropped the atomic bomb on anyone. They did not have that technology.
In 1945 two atomic weapons were used against Japan .