Keynesian (John Keynes) economics is all about using monetary and fiscal (Government) policies to help direct the market towards equilibrium. Keynes didn't believe that the market was self-correcting, and thus required government involvement. Keynesian economics also uses the view that prices are constant in the short term and only adjust in the long term (sticky price theorem). This delay in price adjustment pulls the market away from equilibrium.
Classical Economics (Adam Smith) is based on the idea that an "invisible hand" controls the market place and government involvement just creates an inefficient market place. Adam Smith believed that basic supply and demand is capable of maintaining a marketplace equilibrium. Prices are self adjusting and the market reacts immediately to changes thus maintaining equilibrium in the long run and short run. Government policies such as taxes lead to price distortion that can skew consumer rationality, thus leading to disequilibrium (is that even a word?!...unequilibrium??).
Both these views have faults: Classical failed during the Great Depression - this wouldn't happen if there really was an 'invisible hand' to smooth out the economy.
Keynesian was ineffective during the stagflation (high inflation and low employment) of the 1970s, there isn't a policy that can effectively combat both these variables.
AnswerKeynesian (John Keynes) economics is all about using monetary and fiscal (Government) policies to help direct the market towards equilibrium. Keynes didn't believe that the market was self-correcting, and thus required government involvement. Keynesian economics also uses the view that prices are constant in the short term and only adjust in the long term (sticky price theorem). This delay in price adjustment pulls the market away from equilibrium.Classical Economics (Adam Smith) is based on the idea that an "invisible hand" controls the market place and government involvement just creates an inefficient market place. Adam Smith believed that basic supply and demand is capable of maintaining a marketplace equilibrium. Prices are self adjusting and the market reacts immediately to changes thus maintaining equilibrium in the long run and short run. Government policies such as taxes lead to price distortion that can skew consumer rationality, thus leading to disequilibrium (is that even a word?!...unequilibrium??).
Both these views have faults: Classical failed during the Great Depression - this wouldn't happen if there really was an 'invisible hand' to smooth out the economy.
Keynesian was ineffective during the stagflation (high inflation and low employment) of the 1970s, there isn't a policy that can effectively combat both these variables.
That government played a limited role in the economy.
Implications of Foreign Direct Investment in Indian Economy
The federal government did little to nothing to help people financially, because they didn't think it was their position to
There is no Indian army.
the role of the government in the market structure is to control inflection
Check out the related link on LIC's role in the Indian economy.
it delivers goods to their British masters
No role the government should play.
This answer is that the governments role is very little
mixed economy
He advocated a strong role of govt. in managing the economy...
He advocated a strong role of govt. in managing the economy...
ryk
This answer is that the governments role is very little
This answer is that the governments role is very little
The role of rivers in the Indian economy is very huge. The rivers form the main backbone for agriculture which is a main source of income for most families.
The government has no role in a traditional economy other than keeping peace to the degree where different individuals can conduct trade in peace.