Want this question answered?
Analyze the experiment to decide whether the results were flawed.
The conclusion is the goal of performing the experiment, without it the written results of the experiment would only be a "jumble of data". Other scientists need the conclusion both to validate the experimenter's reasoning and to decide on future experimental directions to take.
To clearly state why the experiment was performed
The first step is to decide on the purpose of the experiment. What is it that you are trying to prove or disprove.
Scientists look at their data and decide if the data supports the hypothesis.If the data is exactly the same after many experiments, the hypothesis is supported.If the data does not support the hypothesis, scientist may change the hypothesis or change the experiment .
Analyze the experiment to decide whether the results were flawed.
To clearly state why the experiment was performed
The conclusion is the goal of performing the experiment, without it the written results of the experiment would only be a "jumble of data". Other scientists need the conclusion both to validate the experimenter's reasoning and to decide on future experimental directions to take.
Oh yes, many times, scientists can help decide from what time period artifacts are from. Also, scientists may be needed to help study the artifacts...
Politics decide the funding for scientific research, and without political backing of an experiment or study, the project would have no funding to conduct said study
i think what you wear in the day depends on thats day weather but on scientific perspective you dont need it, for in you dont need observation, hypothesis,experiment,conclusion and theory to dress for the day.
You would design an experiment to test the balls.
The first step is to decide on the purpose of the experiment. What is it that you are trying to prove or disprove.
Scientists look at their data and decide if the data supports the hypothesis.If the data is exactly the same after many experiments, the hypothesis is supported.If the data does not support the hypothesis, scientist may change the hypothesis or change the experiment .
When they discovered pluto did not follow the full criteria to be considered a planet. They needed a different scientific term to describe “planets” like pluto.
To answer the question for your self for what ever test you have mind, all you need to do is decide whether it would be OK to do that experiment on a human of comparably limited mental developement without their conscent.
no no no