answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The conclusion is the goal of performing the experiment, without it the written results of the experiment would only be a "jumble of data". Other scientists need the conclusion both to validate the experimenter's reasoning and to decide on future experimental directions to take.

User Avatar

Wiki User

6y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why do scientists write conclusions to experiments?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What can scientists do if the results of an experiments do not support a hypothesis?

draw conclusions


What do scientists do after the reach conclusions from the results of their experiments?

They share the results of the experiment.


At which stage of scientific thinking are scientists most likely to consider the data and conclusions of other scientists to propose new experiments?

analyzing data


What do scientists draw after analyzing data from experiment?

After analyzing data from their experiments, scientists will draw conclusions. They will consider whether their hypothesis was correct and what the observable trends were in the data.


Why is it important for scientist to keep accurate records of their experiments?

If scientists are to be able to draw meaningful conclusions from their experiments, they must have accurate records. If you do not know exactly what happened, you will not be able to figure out exactly what it means.


Scientists use experiments and observations to make logical conclusions about scientific inquiries This process is called what?

scientific method


Why do scientists test other scientists conclusions?

Lots of different scientists test the same things to compare different conclusions.


What are two ways scientists can share their results of their experiments?

they could write a presentation or a written report


What is a scientific paper?

A published document written by a scientist or team of scientists to describe a scientific project - i.e. what they were trying to prove, how they set about it, the results of their experiments and what conclusions they drew.


Why is it important that scientists conclusions are based on evidence?

They rely on there conclusions based on observations.


Repeating observations or experiments to confirm prior conclusions?

replication


What must scientists base their conclusions on to avoid being impartial?

Their conclusions must be repeatedly tested by other scientists and maintain a consistent conclusion.