great weight of evidence
Before a formal criminal trial may take place, the prosecution must either file a Bill of Information, or have the defendant indicted by a Grand Jury. The defendant has no right to confront witnesses at the Grand Jury hearing and the standard of proof to indict for trial is by a preponderance of evidence, or "more likely than not".
This would be an adjudication hearing. At this hearing, a Judge is required to make a finding based on evidence and arrive at a judgment. The adjudication hearing is comparable to an adult trial and the standard of proof used-beyond a reasonable doubt-is similar to that used in adult trials.
the standard is proof beyond a reasonable doubt
What logical proof is there for the reality of numbers
Burden of proof is who has to prove the case by meeting or exceeding the standard of proof. In a criminal case, it's the prosecution. In a civil case, it's the plaintiff. Standard of proof is the unquantifiable amount of proof that must be shown. In criminal cases, it's beyond a reasonable doubt. In civil cases, it's a preponderance of the evidence.
Most likely, but you are going to need either a doctor's prescription or have proof of a certified hearing test indicating the need to hearing aids.
David Braine has written: 'The reality of time and the existence of God' -- subject(s): God, Proof, Time 'Medical ethics and human life' -- subject(s): Christian ethics, Life, Medical ethics
The burden of proof is ALWAYS upon the plaintiff in everycourt, regardless of where the court is.
(in the US) The burden of proof is always borne by the posecution.In the case of a DWI prosecution, the standard is "proof beyond a REASONABLE doubt." NOTE: Not beyond ALL doubt, just beyond reasonable doubt.
The standard bullet proof vest is not stab proof, however there are some bullet proof vests that are. These stab-proof vests have a wire mesh on the outside, or a similar material.
You cannot say that something is "EITHER this OR that." There can be only ONE standard of PROOF. How else would anyone know what "proof" is.
No. "Proof by a preponderance of the evidence" (meaning: my argument can beat up your argument) is the standard for most civil trials. "Proof beyond a resonable doubt" (meaning: unless UFOs are real we gotcha) is the standard for most criminal trials.