No. "Proof by a preponderance of the evidence" (meaning: my argument can beat up your argument) is the standard for most civil trials. "Proof beyond a resonable doubt" (meaning: unless UFOs are real we gotcha) is the standard for most criminal trials.
The prosecutor must show a preponderance of evidence that the consent was voluntary.
A 'Preponderance of the Evidence.'
Preponderance of the evidence, also known as balance of probabilities is the standard required in most civil cases. The standard is met if the proposition is more likely to be true than not true. Effectively, the standard is satisfied if there is greater than 50 percent chance that the proposition is true. Lord Denning, in Miller v. Minister of Pensions [1947] 2 All ER 372, described it simply as "more probable than not."
Preponderance of evidence refers to the standard of proof required in civil cases, which means that the evidence presented must be more convincing than the evidence presented by the opposing party. It is commonly described as "more likely than not" or greater than a 50% likelihood. This standard is lower than "beyond a reasonable doubt" used in criminal cases.
Preponderance means excess or more than required. For example: In a court room, the judge might say: The preponderance of evidence indicates that the defendant is guilty of murder in the first degree.
In re Winship, 397 US 358 (1970)In Winship, the Court elevated the standard of proof for conviction in juvenile court cases from "a preponderance of the evidence" to "beyond reasonable doubt," as required in adult criminal proceedings.
It depends on the purpose of the hearing and whether the issue is criminal or civil. Generally, evidence is required at a trial or when you are asking the court to issue an order on your behalf.
The answer is: In delinquency matters the state must prove its case beyone a reasonable doubt. Prior to In re Winship, a lower standard of evidence had been required by juvenile courts in some states-a mere preponderance of the evidence.
In any civil law matter, the burden of proof is always based on the preponderence of the evidence, not beyond a reasonable double like criminal law, and it rests on that of the Plaintiff, not the state as in criminal law.
The burden of proof in a civil trial is the preponderance of the evidence, also known as balance of probabilities is the standard required in most civil cases. The standard is met if the proposition is more likely to be true than not true.
Weight over and above what is required by law or custom., Superabundance of weight; preponderance., Overweighing; excessive.
Weight over and above what is required by law or custom., Superabundance of weight; preponderance., Overweighing; excessive.